节点文献

信用证欺诈例外原则下的银行权利义务分析

Analysis of Rights and Obligations of the Bank under the Principle of L/C Fraud Exception

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 韩超熊祯

【Author】 HAN Chao, XIONG Zhen (Law School,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)

【机构】 山东大学法学院2002级法律硕士班山东大学法学院2002级法律硕士班 山东250100山东250100

【摘要】 信用证欺诈例外原则是对信用证抽象独立性原则的排除。在信用证欺诈例外原则适用的情形下,银行往往处于两难的境地,因此厘清其权利义务有重要意义。借鉴并吸收英美国家的先进经验,笔者认为银行有止付权、调查权、受偿权;银行有合理谨慎地审核单据的义务、通知义务和禁令遵从义务。我国应尽快对信用证及其欺诈问题立法,并提高法官对国际惯例的认知水平,为我国银行业的健康发展营造一个良好的法律环境。

【Abstract】 The principle of L/C fraud exception is an exclusion to the doctrine of L/C autonomy. In cases where the fraud exception is applied, the bank will be in a dilemma; therefore, it is of great importance to make clear the bank’s rights and obligations. Enlightened by the established principles adopted by UK and U.S.A, the author believes that the bank is entitled to withhold the payment against the beneficiary, execute investigations, and be reimbursed, while the bank has the obligations to take reasonable care to examine documents, advise the party presenting the documents and obey the injunction. In order to create a favorable legal environment for the healthy development of the banking system in China, national laws that govern the L/C and the L/C fraud should be enacted as soon as possible, and an assured good understanding of the international conventions pertinent to these issues is required among judges.

【关键词】 信用证欺诈银行权利义务
【Key words】 L/C fraudbankrightsobligationsreflection
  • 【文献出处】 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年06期
  • 【分类号】D996
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】323
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络