节点文献

林地面积量算方法的比较研究

Comparison of different survey and calculating methods of forestland area

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 冯仲科刘永霞王小昆邓向瑞

【Author】 FENG Zhongke; LIU Yongxia; WANG Xiaokun; DENG Xiangrui. School of Resources and Environment,Beijing Forestry University,100083,P.R.China.

【机构】 北京林业大学资源与环境学院北京林业大学资源与环境学院

【摘要】 为解决林地面积测量计算的难题 ,作者通过对各种面积量算方法的比较研究 ,总结了各种量算方法的优缺点和适应性 ,比较了仪器实测与图上量测林地面积精度之间的关系 ,得知图上量测林地面积的精度因存在不可避免的系统误差而比仪器实测林地面积的精度低 .最后 ,该文着重推导了利用三次样条法测定林地面积的数学原理 ,并对梯形公式法、辛普生法、等距三次样条法和三次样条法对于林地面积边界不规则曲线的拟合原理进行了分析比较 .结合对中国科协北京绿化基地地块同精度的GPS测量试验结果 ,与运用上述 4种方法量算面积的精度结果进行比较 ,得知三次样条法量算林地面积的精度最高 ,且便于实时差分GPS(RTDGPS)作业 .

【Abstract】 In order to increase the accuracy of forestland area calculation, the authors compare several calculating methods, and compare the accuracies of surveying with instrument and those of measuring on map for forestland area. Results show that the accuracy of the former is higher, because the latter fails to eliminate the system error. At last, the authors emphasize on deducing Cubic Spline to survey forestland area, comparing simulation theories of ladder_shaped formula, Simpson formula, equate_interval Cubic Spline formula and Cubic Spline for the irregular curve of forestland area. Through the test on experimental plots of Chinese Science Society, the authors analyze the accuracies of above_mentioned four methods, and conclude that Cubic Spline has the highest accuracy and is convenient for RTD GPS operation.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金重大项目 ( 3 0 0 70 619);“863”国家高新技术项目 ( 2 0 0 4AA2 45 0 3 0 )共同资助
  • 【文献出处】 北京林业大学学报 ,Journal of Beijing Forestry University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年05期
  • 【分类号】S771
  • 【被引频次】19
  • 【下载频次】266
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络