节点文献

滥用职权罪的客观要件解释

On Defining the Objective Composition of the Crime of Abusing Administrative Power

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 胡乾坤陈智元

【Author】 HU Qian-kun, CHEN Zhi-yuan(Graduate School of Chinese University of Politics and Law ,Beijing 100088,China)

【机构】 中国政法大学研究生院中国政法大学研究生院 北京100088北京100088

【摘要】 构成滥用职权罪的行为同时具有刑法上和行政法上之双重意义。刑法意义上之"超越职权"与"行政越权"并非完全同一;"违反规定处理公务"包括行政自由裁量权的滥用与羁束权的滥用;"行政不作为"犯罪定性的关键,在于认定行为人行为时的主观心理。滥用职权罪的立法需完善,核心在于罪名分解,并注意保持刑法与行政法的协调统一。

【Abstract】 The act of abusing administrative power has double meanings, concerning both criminal law and administrative law. We must distinguish power-exceeding in the criminal law from the exceeding of administrative power. Abusing administrative power includes abusing the discretionary power and the non-discretionary power. The administrative omission constitutes the crime ,the key lies in the actors mental state. The suggestion of legislative improvement is that the accusation should be decomposed,meanwhile , keep the coordination between criminal law and administrative law.

  • 【文献出处】 北华大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Beihua University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年01期
  • 【分类号】D924
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】334
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络