节点文献

论胡适治学方法潜在的学术前提

The Potential Academic Presupposition of the Methods of HU Shi’s Pursuit of Studies

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陆发春胡琴娥

【Author】 LU Fa-chun,HU Qin-e (Department of History Studies, Anhui University, Hefei 230039,China)

【机构】 安徽大学历史系安徽大学历史系 安徽合肥230039安徽合肥230039

【摘要】 有人认为,胡适倡导的"大胆的假设,小心的求证"的治学方法符合科学研究的过程和规律,有其科学合理之处;但又有人认为胡适在"大胆的假设"之前缺乏搜求材料这一科学研究过程中最为重要的一步。我们认为对胡适治学方法应做实事求是地分析,要从胡适"大胆的假设,小心的求证"这一治学方法潜在的学术前提着手,探讨胡适提出"大胆的假设"之前并不缺乏搜求材料这一步。

【Abstract】 Someone considered that it was reasonable for HU Shi to advocate the way of pursuit of studies that one should take upon oneself to propose the hypothesis and carefully prove his hypothesis. They thought this method accord with the scientific research and rule. But others considered that HU Shi’s proposal was not perfect because one important step of scientific research prior to the bold hypothesis has missed. We think that we should be practical and realistic about HU Shi’s hypothesis of pursuit of studies. We should start from HU shi’s potential academic presupposition of pursuit of studies that the bold assumption usually results from the careful support.

  • 【文献出处】 安徽教育学院学报 ,Journal of Anhui Institute of Education , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年04期
  • 【分类号】I206.6
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】221
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络