节点文献

控/缓释肥在不同介质中的氮素释放特性及其肥效评价

N release characteristics of controlled/slowed-release fertilizer in different media and its effects evaluation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杜建军廖宗文毛小云刘可星冯新

【Author】 DU Jianjun1, LIAO Zongwen2 , MAO Xiaoyun2 , LIU Ke\|xing2, FENG Xin2 (1 Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Lab., Zhongkai Agrotechnical College, Guangzhou 510225,China; 2 New Fertilizer Resources Research Lab, South China Agric. Univ., Guangzhou 510642, China)

【机构】 仲恺农业技术学院植物营养与肥料研究室华南农业大学新肥料资源研究室华南农业大学新肥料资源研究室 广东广州510225广东广州510642广东广州510642

【摘要】 以水、土壤、砂子、土壤+砂子和土壤+沸石为介质,研究了5种控/缓释肥的溶(淋)出特征。结果表明,由于性质不同,同一肥料在不同介质中的溶(淋)出率和溶(淋)出模式有很大差异。水中溶出率虽可以快速比较不同控/缓释肥的溶出速率,但用以估测肥料在田间的实际肥效,则产生较大的误差。客观、合理地评价控/缓释肥,应该在"肥料 土壤 作物"系统中考虑。相对而言,考虑土壤因子的土柱淋出率法较水中溶出率法更为接近田间实际。

【Abstract】 Several media (water, soil, sand, mixture of soil and sand, and mixture of soil and zeolite) were used to study the nutrient release characteristics of five controlledrelease fertilizers (CRFs) or slowrelease fertilizers (SRFs). The results showed that for a fertilizer there were significant differences in release pattern and release rate when dissolving or leaching in different media due to the different properties. So considerable errors might occur if water dissolution rate method was used to estimate the fertilizer efficiency although the method can make quick comparisons of nutrient release rates among different CRFs/SRFs. More objective and reasonable evaluation of CRFs/SRFs should be taken in the system of "Fertilizersoilcrop". Comparatively, soil column leaching method was much closer to the field reality than water dissolution rate method.

【基金】 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划,2001AA246023);广东省科技计划百项工程(2KB045601N);广东省重点科技攻关项目(A20405);上海市科技兴农重点攻关项目[农科攻字(2002)第4 2 2号]资助。
  • 【文献出处】 植物营养与肥料学报 ,Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年02期
  • 【分类号】TQ440
  • 【被引频次】136
  • 【下载频次】1218
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络