【摘要】 目的:通过对该病不同方法治疗后的疗效研究,为医师选择合理的治疗方法提供参考。方法:将290名患者按病情轻重分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ度。Ⅰ度单纯用物理疗法;Ⅱ度及Ⅲ度患者采用手术治疗及物理疗法。结果:Ⅰ度患者42例,物理治疗优良率为41％。Ⅱ、Ⅲ度患者248例,手术治疗加物理疗法,优良率达98％。结论:对Ⅰ度患者应首先选择物理疗法。对Ⅱ、Ⅲ度患者,手术治疗固然重要,但术后的正确物理治疗亦不容忽视。术后及时、正确的物理治疗能巩固手术疗效,提高治疗的优良率。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To offer the reference of the therapy for the orthopeadic doctors by appraising the curative effect after treatment with different methods. Methods: Two hundred and ninty patients were divided into Ⅰ (42) , Ⅱ and Ⅲgroups (248) according to the condition of patients. Group Ⅰ were only treated by physical therapy, groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were treated by surgical therapy and physical therapy. Results: The curative rate of group Ⅰ was 41% . The curative rate of groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ counted to 98%. Conclusions: Physical therapy is firstly chosen to group Ⅰ . Surgical therapy is certainly important for the patients in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ , but physical therapy can not be neglected after operation. If it is timely and correctly used, the curative rate can be increased.更多还原