【摘要】 传统的生命权应做与时俱进的概念和理念改造 ,方宜入宪。“生命安全权”比“生命权”更为积极和入时 ,也与我国政府主张的“生存权”更为接近 ;只有“生命安全权”才既有助于纠正传统和现实中轻视公民生命的现象 ,又强化国家和社会救助生命危难的责任意识 ,并与宪法中的物质帮助权相配套。“生命健康权”不宜入宪 ,因为这是两个不同的权利类型 ,缺乏合一性 ,而且宪法中的权利条款已显示了健康权。更多还原

【Abstract】 Traditional right of life shall be improved with respect to concepts and notions in time and then it can be adopted into the constitution. “Right of life and security” is more active and popular than “right of life”, is closer to the “right of existence” held by Chinese government. Only the “right of life and security” is helpful not only to correct the phenomenon of belittling citizens’ life in the tradition and the actual reality but also to strengthen the awareness of responsibility of a state and society to rescue life jeopardy and make it consistent with the right of physical assistance in the constitution. It is improper to adopt the “right of life and health” in the constitution, because they are two different kinds of rights and there are no syncretic characters. What’s more, the item of rights of the constitution has shown the right to health.更多还原