【摘要】 合同法立法者原只想将传统的或暗或明的过错责任原则改为明定的过错推定责任原则。然而有些学者眼见更为新潮、已为英美民法及一些国际公约渐用的严格责任原则,便建议追潮,终为新法吸纳。对此,本文提出质疑,认为暗定严格责任原则是一种矫枉过正的无赖的法技术和法选择,不利知法、守法和司法,严格责任原则不为大陆法系大多国家目前立法所采信,暗定亦不是英美民法及公约之所为。建议将违约责任明确定为过错推定责任原则,以合现情,以符法之明确性的本质要求。更多还原

【Abstract】 Based on the questions about the principle of strict liability in the contract law,the article raised an objection,held that unclearly making the principle of strict liability was a kind of overcorrect legal technique and choice which is unfavourable to knowing,obeying and enforcing the law,and suggested the principle of liability for fault calculated should be made clearly to meet the present situation and the essential requirement of the clear character of the law.更多还原