【摘要】 鲁迅和施蛰存,两位在新文学不同时期成长起来的作家,不同的时空观和在文坛不同的位置从一开始就给"《庄子》与《文选》之争"带来不利因素,但如果两人都试图弄清对方在什么背景下说什么,并都能试图将问题放到语言建设这一共同的领域,那么,一场有关白话文理论建设的有意义的讨论仍将会展开。遗憾的是,这场原本具有学术意义的争论,最终转化成一场争吵。更多还原

【Abstract】 Being a significant debate, it is not to make a chance for his opinion accepted by the opponent, but to provide the different constructive suggestions for discussing on the same problem. Its aim is not for compromise, but for construction and solution. LU Xun and SHI Zhecun from the very beginning had brought the disadvantage element for the debate, owning to their different growing backgrounds and time-space views, and positions as well. Yet, if both of them had tried to learn the real situation of their remarks, and also tried to put the problem into the area of language construction, then, a significant debate on the construction of vernacular theories would have been carried out. Its pity that a debate would-be resulted as a quarrel at last.更多还原