【摘要】 目的　比较新森田疗法与康复疗法对精神分裂症康复治疗的效果。方法　将 12 0例精神分裂症患者随机分为新森田疗法组和康复疗法组 ,治疗 8周。于治疗前后分别用IPROS ,BPRS、自知力评定进行自身和相互对照以评定疗效。结果　两组治疗前后自身对照IPROS分量表及总分值、BPRS量表总分及因子分、自知力恢复情况均有显著性差异 (P <0 0 1) ;新森田疗法组康复效果、焦虑抑郁和缺乏活力因子分的减分率及自知力恢复均较康复疗法组更显著 (P均 <0 .0 1)。结论　新森田疗法和康复疗法对协助临床改善精神分裂症的部分精神症状 ,自知力的恢复和社会功能的提高均有效 ,但新森田疗法的疗效更显著。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective It is to compared the efficacy of new Morita therapy with that of rehabilitation therapy on recovery of schizophrenia. Methods 120 schizophrenic inpatients were randomly divided into new Morita therapy group and rehabilitation therapy group. IPROS, BPRS and the rating of insight were used to evaluate the efficacy before treatment and eight weeks after treatment. Results IPROS, BPRS and the rating of insight in both groups after treatment were significant different from before (P<0.01). New Morita therapy group showed more significant efficacy (P<0.01). The reduction rate of anxiety-depression and anergia scores of BPRS in new Morita therapy group was larger than that of rehabilitation therapy group (P<0.01). The recovery of insight was also better in new Morita therapy group (P<0.01). Conclusion Both new Morita therapy and rehabilitation therapy are effective on improvement of schizophrenic symptoms, recovery of insight and social function in schizophrenia patients, while new Morita therapy is better than rehabilitation therapy.更多还原