【摘要】 理解民事财产权利及其立法构造 ,必须厘清民法物的概念。自罗马法以来 ,物的概念之争从未停息 ,物与财产更是纠缠不清。加之 ,现代高科技发展 ,物之形、物之体均呈前所未有之态 ,这不仅为理解民法物带来困惑 ,也造成民事财产权利立法构造的混乱。文章从历史演进、立法比较以及文化学的视角对物与财产界说进行分析比较 ,在此基础上强调民法最根本的属性———可支配性 ,并认为物之立法体系不同乃法律发达之结果。循此思路 ,文章对对《物权法》、以及《民法典》中的物的立法体系提出自己的设想更多还原

【Abstract】 To comprehend the property rights and their legislative structures, it is necessary to clarify the concept of res in the civil law. Since the Roman times, the disputes on the concept of the res and the property in connotation have never been let up, and even the two concepts have also been entangled. In addition, with the development of the high technology, the form and the content of the res have become unprecedented, which brings about the embarrassment in comprehension. This essay focuses on the concept of the res and the property in connotation from the view of historical comparison and cultural science, presents that the fundamental character of the res in the civil law is controllability, and that the difference of the legislative structures result in the modernization of the civil law. Following this point, the essay puts forward its own suggestion for the creation of the real law code and the Chinese future Civil Code with Chinese character.更多还原