【摘要】 目的　计算机辅助调查问卷 (ACASI)方式是否能提高性病 /艾滋病 (STD/AIDS)行为监测资料数据的准确性和可靠性。方法　选取男性从业人员 [ACASI参与者 15人 ,面对面调查 (FFI)参与者 4 5人 ],进行两种问卷技术效果比较。结果　所有参与者都完成了问卷内容 ,采用ACASI的人员认知水平非常显著地低于采用FFI的人员 (P =0 0 0 1) ;在敏感问题回答方面 :涉及安全性行为方面问题的无应答情况比较 ,采用FFI的较采用ACASI的无应答率高 (χ2 =9.0 0 0 ,P =0 .0 0 3) ;对既往是否自觉有性病不适症状比较 ,采用ACASI的人员的肯定回答率是采用FFI人员的 9.2 5倍 ,其差异有非常显著的统计学意义 (P =0 .0 0 0 ) ;其它问题回答差异均未发现有显著的统计学意义。结论　本次调查中未发现运用ACASI较运用FFI能更有效的提高敏感问题回答的可靠性 ,但ACASI能有效减少无应答率 ,其本身具有的优越性值得进一步论证更多还原

【Abstract】 objective To investigate whether audio computer-assisted self-admini stered interview(ACASI) technology for measuring the risk behavior of STD and AI DS can improve the accuracy and reliability of data. Methods We compared the effect of the two methods for reporting of risk behaviors among the selected samples (all individuals were men including 15 participants by ACASI and 45 persons by face-to-face inteniew(FFI). Results All the participants completed the filling of the questionnaires and answered all the questions contained. The cognition abou t STD and AIDS was lower in the ACASI group than in the FFI group(P=0.001); as for HIV sensitive behaviors, the items on non-response rates of safe-sex we re found more significant in missing data by using FFI than by using ACASI appro ach (χ 2=9.000, P=0.003).The affirmative response rates about history of s elf-sensational symptom of STD were 9 25 times in ACASI higher than in FFI, ( P=0.000). Other variables were also examined individually, but no significan t differences were observed. Conclusions We found no evidence of increased reliability in sensitive reports by ACASI, but i t could reduce the non-response percentages and has its own advantages, so it s hould continue to be improved and tested in various programs and population grou ps.更多还原