【摘要】 本文对前人不曾作过专题考论的《蒲氏漫斋录》的相关问题作了比较细致的考索和论述,并纠正了《中国历代诗话选》、《宋金元文学批评史》、《宋诗话全编》等处理该书的一些错误,指出:一、《蒲氏漫斋录》和《漫斋语录》等是同书而异名之作,《诗话选》目为两种书,不妥;二、《蒲氏漫斋录》的作者是蒲大受,写作时间至迟不过南宋绍兴末,《批评史》、《诗话选》、《全编》分别对该书作者、作时及不为立目等都有误;三、《蒲氏漫斋录》仅存佚文三十三条,从中表现了蒲大受论学尊洛学、论文崇苏黄,将理学和文学合一的主张。更多还原

【Abstract】 Notes in the Study Man of Mr. Pu Dashou ( Pu shi man zhai lu) is a scholarly work in the Song dynasty, but has never been singly criticized. The text here deliberately discusses on the related problems about this work, and corrects some mistakes in Selections of Chinese Poetic Notes of All Ages , A History of Literary Criticism in the Song, Jin and Yuan Periods, A Complete Anthology of Song Poetic Notes , etc. , while their dealing with this work. The text also points out: 1. Notes in the Study Man of Mr. Pu Dashou ( Pu shi man zhai lu) is same to Analects of the Study Man (Man zhai yu lu), only different in names; 2. Notes in the Study Man of Mr. Pu Dashou was written by Pu Dashou before the end of Era Shaoxing in the Southern Song dynasty; 3. Notes in the Study Man of Mr. Pu Dashou has left only 33 items, which combine the doctrines of the Idealist School with the contemporaneous literature, and express the author ’ s esteem for Su Shi and Huang Tingjian.更多还原