节点文献

多节段脊髓型颈椎病两种后路术式疗效比较

Comparison between the results of two posterior surgical methods for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 孙吉平; 刘强; 张建平;

【Author】 SUN Ji ping, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Jian ping ( Dept of Orthopedics, First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University 030001, China)

【机构】 山西医科大学第一临床医学院骨科; 山西医科大学第一临床医学院骨科 太原030001; 太原030001; 太原030001;

【摘要】 目的 比较后路全椎板切除与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术对多节段脊髓型颈椎病的治疗效果。方法 对 38例患者手术前后情况进行回顾 ,Ⅰ组 18例为全椎板切除术 ,Ⅱ组为单开门椎管扩大成形术 ,比较两组优良率 ,手术并发症。结果 两组优良率短期并发症无明显差别 ,而长期并发症Ⅱ组优于Ⅰ组。结论 对于多节段颈椎病的外科治疗 ,后路单开门椎管成形术是一种较好选择

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the results of expansive open door laminoplasty with laminotomy of cervical spine. Methods All 38 patients with CSM, including 18 with laminotomy (group Ⅰ) and 20 with expansive open door laminoplasty (group Ⅱ) were reviewed. The results and complications of two groups were compared. Results There are no diffrence in short term results betweea two groups; the long term results showed group Ⅱ were better than group Ⅰ. Conclusion The long term results of expansive open door aminoplasty of cervical spine for CSM are good and stable.

  • 【文献出处】 山西医科大学学报 ,Journal of Shanxi Medical University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年03期
  • 【分类号】R687.3
  • 【下载频次】59
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络