节点文献

WTO关于生命与健康的贸易争端解决实践

The solve practice on trade disputes about life and health of WTO

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 曹义强邓志能

【Author】 CAO Yi-qiang1, DENG Zhi-neng2 (1. Foshan Optoelectronic Epuipment Corp., Foshan 528000; 2 Shenzhen Municipal Party Committee Organizing Department, Shenzhen 518023, China)[

【机构】 佛山光电器材公司深圳市委组织部 广东佛山528000广东深圳518023

【摘要】 GATT对人类、动植物生命健康保护的条款体现在第 2 0条 (b)之中 ,但是 ,由于此款规定的含糊 ,导致了很多贸易争端。乌拉圭回合达成的《动植物卫生检疫措施协议》(SPS协议 )在法律上是对此款的一个补充。然而 ,在应用该协议的贸易实践中 ,发生诸多争端 ,反映了该协议存在着诸多漏洞。对这些漏洞进行分析有着重要意义。本文结合近期发生的一些案例 ,分析了协议中发生争端的一些条款并提出了中国应用这些条款的一些对策。

【Abstract】 The protection of GATT on human being, animals and plants life and health is stated in Article 20(b). But it caused many trade disputes because of the ambiguity stipulation of this article. In Uruguay Round, animal and plant health quarantine measure agreement was reached(SPS Agreement),which is the leagle supplement for this article. However, in the trading practice of applying this agreement, there are a lot of disputes, which mean that there are many loopholes on this article. So it is important to analyze these loopholes. In the thesis the authors analyzed some articles with disputes in this agreement and studied some present cases. They put forward some measures that can be applied in China.[

【基金】 .NULL.
  • 【文献出处】 兰州商学院学报 ,Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年02期
  • 【分类号】F740.4
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】49
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络