节点文献

猪用中草药饲料添加剂组方筛选试验

The Screening Test on the Formula of Chinese Herb As Feed Additives for swine

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 戴荣国曹国文曾代勤姜永康陈春林周淑兰刘宗惠钟正泽

【Author】 DAI Rong-guo,CAO Guo-wen,ZENG Dai-qin,JIANG Yong-kang,LIU Zong-hui,ZHONG Zheng-ze,et al(Chongqing Swine Science Academy,Chongqing Rongchang402460,China)

【机构】 重庆市养猪科学研究院重庆市养猪科学研究院 重庆荣昌402460重庆荣昌402460重庆荣昌402460

【摘要】 试验采用单因子设计,54头断奶猪(长×荣,20kg左右)根据体重、性别随机分成6个处理组,每个处理3次重复,每次重复3头试验猪。结果表明:20~60kg阶段,平均日增重(ADG)Ⅰ、Ⅱ组显著高于Ⅳ组和抗生素组25.80%、26.03%和25.27%、25.49%(p<0.05)。增重/料耗(G/F)各处理间无显著差异,但中草药Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组较抗生素组有提高趋势。20~90kg整个生长育肥期分析,Ⅰ组显著高于抗生素组20.89%(p<0.05);G/F中草药组都比抗生素组有提高趋势,分别为7.48%、4.33%、6.30%、6.30%、0.78%(P>0.05)。

【Abstract】 A single factorial was used in the experiment,54weaned piglets(Landrace×Rongchang,20kg initially)were allotted into6treatment s(Ⅰ~Ⅴchinese medical herb groups andⅣantibiotic group)of3replicates with3pigs per replicate by weight and sex.The results showed that,at20~60kg stage,ADG in the experiment ,groupⅠandⅡwere higher25.80%、26.03%and25.27%、25.49%(p<0.05)than that ofⅣand antibiotic groups.G/F Were not significantly influenced among treatment groups,but showing the higher tendency than in groupsⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ.At 20~90kg stage,ADG,the experiment groupⅠwas higher20.89%(p<0.05)than in antibiotic group.G/F,the chinese medical herb groups showed a tendency to improve,they were7.48%、4.33%、6.30%、6.30%、0.78%(P>0.05)respectively higher than that of antibiotic group.

【关键词】 中草药添加剂组方筛选
【Key words】 swinechinese herb additivesformulascreening
【基金】 重庆市“十五”科技攻关项目(编号:2001—41—13)。
  • 【文献出处】 四川畜牧兽医 ,Sichuan Animal and Veterinary Sciences , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年11期
  • 【分类号】S816.7
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】135
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络