节点文献

论欺诈之法律后果

On the Legal Effect of Fraud

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 姜兆林全先银修振善

【Author】 Jiang Zhaolin , Quan Xianyin , Xiu Zhenshan (1 .The college of Ecnomil Management of LaiYang Agricultural University,Laiyang Shandong 265200;2 . Law Gepcument of Chinese Social Acdemil, Beijing 100102; 3.Yaitai Prison of Shandong,Laiyang Shandong 265200)

【机构】 莱阳农学院经济管理学院中国社会科学院山东省烟台监狱 山东 莱阳 265200北京 100102山东 莱阳 265200

【摘要】 欺诈为意思表示瑕疵之一种,由欺诈故意、欺诈行为及欺诈行为——错误判断——意思表示之因果链共存构成。欺诈的法律后果,我国民法通则规定为无效,但合同法的相关规定赋予其可撤销的效力,由是可以更加体现意思自治、更好地保障受欺诈人利益的。欺诈行为同时构成侵害受欺诈者精神自由权的侵权行为,侵权行为的赔偿请求权与撤销权之间发生责任聚合。

【Abstract】 As a kind of the qualification of the express of will, fraud is acnstituted by the fraud intention, the fraud conduct and the relation both between the frand conduct and the wrong judgement and between theworng judgement and the express of will.The legal effect of fraud is invalid according to the General Princi-ple of Civil Law. While according to Chinese Contract Law, it is abolishable so that the rights of the deceivedpersen can be protected and the autcnomy of will can be manifested. Fraud is also a kind of tort, and the de-ceiled person may have the right of claiming for damages.

【关键词】 欺诈无效可撤销意思自治
【Key words】 fraudinvalidabolishableautonomy of will
  • 【文献出处】 莱阳农学院学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Laiyang Agricultural College(Social Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年03期
  • 【分类号】D923
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】228
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络