节点文献
也谈“不听”作“不允许”解的始见年代及书证
Another Talk on the Earliest Year and the Book Evidence of "Not Listen " as "Not Allow
【摘要】 考之于古籍"不听""不许"互为异文、古训家以"许"训"听"、"听""许"同义连文诸语言事实,无一不在说明,"不听"用为"不允许"义最迟产生于汉初。而谢质彬先生《"不听"作"不允许"解的始见年代及书证》关于"不听"作"不允许"解年代的判定标准、论证过程及相应结论都是有欠妥帖的。且谢文所提判定"不听"意义的语义标准和语法标准也是相矛盾的。
【Abstract】 In the ancient books "not listen" meant "not allow", and vice versa. Ancient experts used "allow "for "listen", the two words meaning the same thing. In many languages "mot listen" meant "not allow", which could be traced back as early as the early Han Dynasty. However, Mr. Xie Zhibin’s judging norms about the earliest year and the process of argument and the conclusion of "not listen "as "not allow" are not properly explained in his book of "The Earliest Year and the Book Evidence of ’not listen’ as ’not allow’ ". Moreover, his semantic and grammatical norms on "not listen" are contradictory too.
- 【文献出处】 辽宁师范大学学报 ,Journal Liaoning Normal University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年06期
- 【分类号】H131
- 【被引频次】2
- 【下载频次】83