节点文献

我国民诉法中发回重审制度的缺陷与立法完善

Defects and Legislative Improvement of Remanding for Retrial in Civil Procedure Law

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 曹昊云张洪艳刘雯霞

【Author】 Cao Haoyun Zhang Hongyan Liu Wenxia (The South central University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430074, Hubei)

【机构】 中南财经政法大学中南财经政法大学 湖北武汉430074湖北武汉430074湖北武汉430074

【摘要】 发回重审是上级人民法院处理案件的方式之一,该制度蕴涵了程序保障、权益保护和监督制约等功能。当前,我国民诉法中的发回重审制度存在的弊端已影响其功能的发挥。为完善该制度,一是要建立发回重审与指定改变管辖并存的制度;二是取消“可能影响正确判决、裁定”这一条件,规定只有严重违反诉讼程序的才发回重审;三是取消实体处理有问题可以发回重审这一规定。

【Abstract】 Remanding for retrial is a way higher court handles the case, it contains the functions of safeguarding the procedure, protecting the rights, and supervision each other. But the legislative defects affect these functions to play. In order to perfect it, firstly, system of remanding and changing jurisdiction should exist at the same time. Secondly, the condition that probably affects corrective judge and ruling should be cancelled, and only serious violation of legal procedure can be remanded. Thirdly, the stipulation of remanding for the problems of substantive disposition should be cancelled too.

【关键词】 发回重审缺陷立法完善
【Key words】 remanding for retrialdefectslegislative improvement.
  • 【文献出处】 甘肃政法成人教育学院学报 ,Journal of Adults Education of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年03期
  • 【分类号】D925.1
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】264
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络