节点文献
差异与成因:两大法系消极公诉权之评析——兼及我国消极公诉权之完善
Difference and Cause-Comment upon Negative Right of Prosecufion on Two Legal systems.
【摘要】 消极公诉权在公诉权理论中占有极为重要的地位 ,两大法系都对之作出了积极的肯定 ,并在立法上作出了相应的规定。但是 ,两大法系对消极公诉权的规定又显示出了巨大的差异 ,这种差异是由于两大法系在国家政治哲学、法律传统、诉讼理念等方面的区别而造成的。本文分析了两者的差异 ,并对我国消极公诉权的完善提出了意见
【Abstract】 Negative right of prosecution,which is very important intheory of right of prosecution,has been regarded as positive and provided consequently in common law system and civil caw system.However,their provsions about negative right of prosecution seem quite different,which result rorm their differences in nation philosophy of politics,legal tradifion,lawsilit concept,efc,all which are discussed in the article.
【关键词】 消极公诉权;
英美法系;
大陆法系;
差异;
成因;
完善;
【Key words】 Negative Right of Prosecution; Anglo-American Law Sysfem; Civil Law System.Cause; Imvprovement.;
【Key words】 Negative Right of Prosecution; Anglo-American Law Sysfem; Civil Law System.Cause; Imvprovement.;
- 【文献出处】 甘肃政法学院学报 ,Journal of Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年03期
- 【分类号】D915.3
- 【被引频次】9
- 【下载频次】191