【摘要】 礼的分歧是汉代今、古文之争的重要方面。《公羊》与《左传》对《春秋》的诸多不同解释 ,其实即因于不同的礼制观 ,以朝聘礼而论 ,《公羊》与《左传》在时朝年限以及汤沐之邑与朝宿之邑等问题上都有明显的分歧 ,这势必影响到二者对《春秋》经文的不同理解。因此 ,理解汉代的礼学 ,对理解汉代的《春秋》学无疑有很大帮助 ,同样 ,汉代《春秋》学也提供了理解古代礼制的有效素材。礼学与《春秋》学的互动关系 ,说明汉代经学的特征之一就是经典互证法更多还原

【Abstract】 Controversy over rites has been a very important issue in the arguments between the contemporary scripture school and the ancient scripture school in the Han Dynasty. The different interpretations of Spring and Autumn Annals in Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo are actually resulted from the different understanding of the ancient ritual system. In the case of princes’ audience with emperor, Commentary of Gongyang and The Tradition of Zuo differ in the interpretaions of such issues as fief, manor estate, etc. Thus, a good understanding of the ritual studies in the Han Dynasty benefits the interpretation of Spring and Autumn Annals, while an acquaintance with the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the Han Dynasty enhances the understanding of the ancient rite system. The inter-relationship of the two proves that a characteristic feature of classics study in the Han Dynasty is mutual corroboration.更多还原