节点文献

应用计算机辅助细胞检测系统(CCT)与传统光镜宫颈涂片520例对比研究

Comparison of computer-assisted cytological test with the traditional cervical smear test

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 田扬顺张瑜宋小川惠延平张海雁薛京华朱海涛史秀珍

【Author】 TIAN Yangshun, ZHANG Yu, SONG Xiaochuan, et al (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, The FourthMilitary Medical University, Xi’an 710033, China)

【机构】 第四军医大学西京医院妇产科陕西省妇幼保健院病理科中国西电集团医院病理科第四军医大学西京医院病理科陕西省妇幼保健院病理科 710033西安710033西安

【摘要】 目的 探讨计算机辅助细胞检测 (computer-assistedcytologicaltest,CCT)与传统光镜检查宫颈涂片相比的优越性。方法 将门诊宫颈病变 (含尖锐湿疣 )涂片 5 2 0例分别经CCT与传统光镜 (又分为A、B两组 )双盲检查 ,对其中 2 83例行病理检查。结果 CCT检查与病理检查符合率为 96 36 % ,传统光镜A组检查与CCT之一致率为 90 5 8% ,B组检查之一致率为 85 0 0 %。结论 CCT检查对发现宫颈异常细胞具有高度敏感性与准确性 ,明显优于传统光镜检查

【Abstract】 Objective To estimate the advantage of computer-assisted cytological test (CCT) in the diagnosis of cervical diseases over traditional microscopic Pap’s smear Methods Five hundred and twenty outpatients’ cervical smears (including condyloma acuminata) were examined both by CCT and traditional microscopy(the latter was divided into two groups,group A and B),283 of which underwent pathological examination Results The coincident rate of CCT to pathological biopsy was 96 36%,but the coincidence of group A and group B to CCT were 90 58% and 85 00% respectively Conclusions CCT has a higher sensitivity and accuracy in detection of cervical abnormal cells,and is much better than the traditional optical microscope

【基金】 陕西省自然科学研究计划项目资助 ( 95SW40 )
  • 【文献出处】 中国妇产科临床 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetric and Gynecology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年01期
  • 【分类号】R446.8
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】36
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络