节点文献

论中国CPA审计法律责任的制度缺失与重构

On Institutional Imperfection and Reestablishment of China’s Legal Liability for CPA Auditing

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张福康

【Author】 ZHANG Fu-kang (Business School, Yangzhou University, yangzhou 225009, China)

【机构】 扬州大学商学院 江苏扬州225009

【摘要】 目前 ,我国CPA在涉及上市公司审计业务过程中 ,发生的舞弊现象十分严重 ,但是在处罚中存在严重的法律责任制度缺失问题 ,突出表现在法律责任缺乏界定依据 ,起诉主体法律条文不明 ,诉讼门槛起点太高 ,赔偿金额难以确定 ,处罚形式避重就轻。CPA参与上市公司舞弊的重要原因是 :民事赔偿机制严重缺失 ,地方政府过于庇护。重构CPA审计法律责任的制度设想 :明确CPA法律责任的界定依据和机构 ,建立民事责任赔偿机制 ,大力推广合伙制会计师事务所 ,建立CPA法律责任风险防范机制

【Abstract】 Currently there are serious fraudulent practices in our CPA concerning listed company auditing. Nevertheless, the serious institutional shortage of legal liability in punishment, which is highlighted by the definitive baselessness for legal liability, the uncertainty of prosecuting principal’s legal provisions, too high a starting point of legal proceeding, the difficult determination of indemnity and the leniency in punishment. The main reasons for CPA’s involvement in listed companies’ fraudulent practice are the serious lack of civil compensation mechanism, imperfection of corporate governance structure, too much trade protection the defects of organizational form of limited liability in accounting firm, too much harborage by local government. Accordingly, we should establish CPA legal liability system by doing the opposite to the above mentioned reasons.

【关键词】 CPA审计舞弊法律责任制度安排
【Key words】 CPAauditing fraudlegal liabilityinstitutional arrangement
  • 【文献出处】 当代经济科学 ,Modern Economic Science , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年03期
  • 【分类号】D922.27
  • 【被引频次】36
  • 【下载频次】785
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络