节点文献

三种DNA片段回收纯化方法的比较

Comparison of three kinds of methods used in DNA extraction and purification

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 侯义龙姜国斌周其兴张立娟于亚军

【Author】 HOU Yi-long, JIANG Guo-bin, ZHOU Qi-xing, ZHANG Li-juan, YU Ya-jun(College of Bioengineering, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China; Laboratory of Life Science, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China; Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenyang 110016, China)

【机构】 大连大学生物工程学院,大连大学生物工程学院,大连大学生物工程学院,大连大学生物工程学院,大连大学生物工程学院 辽宁大连116622大连大学生命科学工作室,辽宁大连116622中国科学院应用生态研究所,辽宁大连110016,辽宁大连116622大连大学生命科学工作室,辽宁大连116622,辽宁大连116622

【摘要】 本文采用三种方法对苹果褪绿叶斑病毒RT-PCR的特异DNA片段进行了回收纯化。结果表明:用普通琼脂糖替代低融点琼脂糖,回收纯化后产物的浓度及纯度与低融点琼脂糖法基本一致,完全可以用普通琼脂糖替代低融点琼脂糖进行DNA片段的回收纯化,从而降低成本,简化操作.玻璃奶法的回收纯度明显高于低融点琼脂糖法和普通琼脂糖法,且更快速安全.

【Abstract】 Three kinds of methods were chosen to extract and purify DNA fragments from agarose gel. The results show that the purity and concentration of DNA fragments extracted and purified by common agarose method is almost the same as that by low melting agarose method, and the low melting agarose method can be substitued by the common agarose method. The purity and concentration of DNA fragments extracted and purified by glass milk method is obviously higher than that by the other methods. Meanwhile the glass milk method has the characteristics of safety and simplification, but the cost of it is five to six times higher than that of the common agarose method.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30170076);辽宁省博士起动基金资助项目(20021052)
  • 【文献出处】 大连大学学报 ,Journal of Dalian University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年02期
  • 【分类号】S432.41
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】331
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络