【摘要】 明清以来 ,治《说文》者屡次转引戴侗《六书故》中所引的唐本《说文》来考释文字。可见《六书故》所引唐本《说文》有其重要的文字学价值。通过考证 ,认为《六书故》引唐本《说文》“械”篆的“或说内盛为器 ,外盛为械”非许慎《说文》之原说解 ,只可作训读《说文》之佐证。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since Ming and Qing Dynasties,many scholars on Shuowen jiezi(说文解字)have quoted many explanations from Liushugu(六书故),Whose explanations are mainly quoted from Shuowen Jiezi(说文解字)of a Tang Dynasty’s edition to explain the Chinese characters .It is obvious that the quotations of Liushugu (六书故)from Tang’s Shuo Wen Jie Zi(说文解字)have significant importance in the study of Chinese characters.By study,the author of this article thinks the old Chinese character"Xie"(械)has a new form,but not the form as it is quoted in Liushugu (六书故)from the Tang’s Shuowen JieZi(说文解字).The word"Xie"(械)used to have two meanings.One is that you can put some thing in it,it means"Qi"(器),the other is just opposite,it means "Xie"(械)And the two meanings of the word "Xie"(械)are not the original explanations of Shuowen Jiezi(说文解字)by Xu Shen(许慎).There fore ,the author gets to the conclusion that the two meanings of the word "Xie"(械)can be only used as the evidence,but not as original form to help study the Chinese characters.更多还原