节点文献

三种损伤严重度评估方法比较

Comparative Research of Three Methods for Evaluating Injury Severity

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王耀南刘勇章张德常陆雄伟陈学桂

【Author】 Wang Yaonan, Lu Yongzhang, Zhang Dechang, et al Department of Orthopedics, Baogang Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai (201900)

【机构】 上海第二医科大学附属宝钢医院骨科上海第二医科大学附属宝钢医院骨科 201900201900

【摘要】 为检测作者提出的ISS结合LD50评估方法的准确性与可行性.收集250例严重创伤病例.通过ISS结合LD50、TRISS及ASCOT作比较性测评分析。结果显示:三者预测的准确性各种指标均相似。提示:ISS结合LD50评估方法正确性良好.即使在生理指标资料不全情况下仍可使用。此法简便易行,故ISS结合LD50评估方法为一实用的损伤严重度评分方法。

【Abstract】 The authors studied 250 cases of severe trauma in order to evaluate the accuracy and availability of the method of ISS combined with LD50 by comparison with TRISS and ASCOT. Results showed that the expected value of accuracy for these three methods were similar, indicating the method of ISS combined with LD50 is highly accurate, even in the condition of lacking physiological index material, and can be a practical method to evaluate the severity of injury, because of its simplicity and feasibility.

  • 【文献出处】 上海第二医科大学学报 ,Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Secondae Shanghai , 编辑部邮箱 ,1998年01期
  • 【分类号】R641
  • 【下载频次】22
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络