节点文献

HFRS患者尿中病毒抗原检测的实验研究

Experimental study to detect HFRSV antigen in urine from HFRS Patients

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张建傲罗端德李淑莉曾令兰罗全忠冷世信唐天侯徐新献

【Author】 Zhang Jian-a0;LuoDu-ande; Li Shun, et al. (Deportment of Infectious disease, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical University, Wuhan 430022)

【机构】 同济医科大学附属协和医院传染科!武汉430022湖北省宜城市医院湖北省咸宁地区医院湖北省咸宁市医院湖北省通城县医院

【摘要】 目的建立和评价IEDA检测HFRS患者尿中病毒抗原的方法及敏感性和特异性。方法采用自行制备的免抗HFRSV多克隆抗体(Anti-HFRSVIgG),运用免疫酶斑点法(IEDA)检测40例HFRS患者尿中的病毒抗原,同时采用传统的间接免疫荧光法(I-IFA)检测患者血清中抗流行性出血热病毒抗原的IgM型抗体(Anti-HFRSVIgM)作相关分析。结果应用IEDA检测尿中HFRS抗原的总阳性率为65%,早期(5日内)抗原检出率为83.33%,而应用I-IFA检测血清中Anti-HFRSVIgM阳性率为77.8%。结论IEDA与I-IFA检测的结果高度相关,且5病日内的早期诊断率为前者高于后者。

【Abstract】 Objective To establish the method by using immune enzyme dot assay (IEDA) to detect HFRSV antigen, and to evaluate the sensitivity and speificity Of this method. Methods Animmune enzyme dot assay(IEDA) was employed to detect HFRSV antigen in urine from HFRS patients, and compared with indirect immune nurorescence assay (I-IFA), 4o urine sample were detected in this study. Results Total positive rate of HFRSV-antigen detected by IEDA was 65% andpositive rate in primary phase (within 5 days) of HFRSV-antigen was 83. 33% in urine, while thatof anti-HFRSVIgM detected by I-IFA was 77. 8% in serum. Correlation study was employed, thatshowed a highly correlation in the results of IEDA and I-IFA. ConcluSions As compared with IIFA, IEDA is a more specific, sensitive, rapid and simple method with higher POSitive rate in primary phase, lower cost and without special equipment and could be widely used for early diagnosis ofHFRS in hospital at basic levels.[

【关键词】 肾综合征出血热肾综合征出血热病毒免疫酶斑点法
【Key words】 HFRSHFRSVIEDA
  • 【文献出处】 疾病控制杂志 ,CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION , 编辑部邮箱 ,1998年03期
  • 【分类号】R446.6
  • 【下载频次】17
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络