节点文献

流体静高压原位磁测量的误差研究(二)──退磁场的影响

A DISCUSSION ON THE ERRORS FOR THE IN SITU MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS IN HYDROSTATIC HIGH PRESSURE VESSEL

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 苏骁

【Author】 THE INFLUENCE OF DEMAGNETIC FIELDSu Fang 1, Su Xiao 2 (1.Department of Basic Sciences,University of Petroleum,Beijing 102200,P.R.China) (2.Department of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Information Technology Institute,

【机构】 石油大学基础科学系北京信息工程学院计算机科学与技术系

【摘要】 为了探讨流体静高压原位磁测量中退磁场的影响有多大?分别选用6种不同片数(n=1、3、5、7、10、13)的非晶Fe46.3Co0.03Ni46.5Si3.75V0.92B2.5合金薄带样品,先后放进13层密绕直螺线管初级线圈内,采用工业频率400Hz去测量和比较其磁化曲线、磁导率曲线和起始磁化曲线。研究表明:(1)样品片数越多,退磁场的影响越大,导致μm和μi出现惊人的测量误差,以1片(μm=4430,μi=3396)为最准。(2)随着样品片数的增多,测量饱和磁感应强度Bs=0.837~0.762T,表明受退磁场影响较小。(3)若要减小退磁场误差,可将样品做得更薄,如0.2μm薄膜。(4)若要彻底消除退磁场误差,必须采用闭合磁路,如用非晶合金薄带卷成的圆环。

【Abstract】 To study the influence of demagnetic field in the hydrostatic high pressure vessel,we selected 6 samples with different slice number ( n =1,3,5,7,10,13) of amorphous alloy Fe 46.3 Co 0.03 Ni 46.5 ·Si 3.75 V 0.92 B 2.5 ribbon,inserted them into multiple electric solenoid and measured the magnetization,magnetic permeability and initial magnetization,respectively,at 400Hz.We found that:(1) The more the slices of sample,the stronger the influence of demagnetic field was,which leaded in surprising errors of μ m and μ i.For the sample with 1 slice,we obtained the optimal values, μ m=4430, μ i=3396.(2) With the increase of slice number ( n =1~13),we measured saturation magnetic induction B s=0.837~0.762T,indicating the influence of demagnetic field on B s was much small.(3) To reduce the error from demagnetic field,thinner sample could be used,for example thin film with 0.2μm thick.(4) To eliminate the error from demagnetic field,closed magnetic circuit must be adopted,such as ring rolled up by amorphous alloy ribbon.

  • 【文献出处】 高压物理学报 ,CHINESE JOURNAL OF HIGH PRESSURE PHYSICS , 编辑部邮箱 ,1998年02期
  • 【分类号】TM936.3,O521
  • 【下载频次】42
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络