节点文献

替尼泊甙与依托泊甙治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究

CONTROLLED STUDY TENIPOSIDE AND ETOPOSIDE FOR ADVANCED NSCLC

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 季有信朱军徐微刘淑娟王淑华

【Author】 Ji Youxin, Zhu Jun,Xu Mei,et al (Qingdao Cancer Hospital,Qingdao 266042)

【机构】 青岛市肿瘤医院内科

【摘要】 目的比较替尼泊甙(VM-16)与依托泊甙(VP-16)对晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法晚期非小细胞肺癌61例,随机分为A、B两组,A组应用顺铂(DDP)+VP-16方案化疗,B组应用DDP+VM-26方案化疗,2~3周期化疗后评价疗效和不良作用。结果A组有效率为37.5%(12/32),B组有效率为33.3%(7/21),两组无显著差异。A组与B组Ⅲ~Ⅳ级骨髓毒性发生率分别为28.1%和23.8%,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级胃肠道毒性发生率分别为31.3%和23.8%。结论VM-26治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效率与VP-16相似,而不良反应发生率低。

【Abstract】 PURPOSE To compare the anticancer results of VM 26 with VP 16 in advanced non small cell lung cancer. METHODS 61 histologically confirmed NSCLC patients were randomized into two groups after hospitalization. One group was treated wth DDP+VP 16,the other with DDP+VM 26, 21 days per cycle. Patients who completed at least 2 cycles were evaluated. RESULTS 53 patients were evaluated. The response rates for VP 16 and VM 26 groups 37 5% (12/32) and 33 3% (7/21) respectively. There was no significant difference ( P >0 05).The side effects of the two groups were mainly hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS VM 26 is an effective agent for NSCLC,and its toxicities are moderate.

  • 【文献出处】 中国癌症杂志 ,CHINA ONCOLOGY , 编辑部邮箱 ,1997年01期
  • 【分类号】R734.2
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】41
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络