【摘要】 对参加１９９５～１９９６年度中国男子篮球甲级联赛１２支球队的周期安排与竟技状态的调控情况进行了调查、分析。研究结果表明：男篮甲级联赛同期的划分与传统的单周期、双周期理论并没有本质的区别，但其显著不同的是竞赛期相对较长，整个竞赛期又由许多小同期（“三天型”和四天型”小周期）构成：男篮甲级联赛准备期的时间跨度为２个月左右比较适宜：赛季中“三天型”小周期的训练时间为３ｄ（连续２场在主场比赛）或２ｄ（在客场比赛），“四天型”小周期的训练时间为４ｄ或３ｄ。男篮甲级联赛运动员的竞技状态表现出“波浪型的特点；在调控运动员竞技状态时，应正确处理好大周期与小同期的关系．更多还原

【Abstract】 The periodic arrangement of 12 teams,taking part in the Chinese basketball major leagues ofmen in the year of 1995 to 1996,and the control of the competitive readiness of the players were investigated and analyzed. The results showed that there was no essential distinction between the periodic division inbasketball major leagues of men and traditional theory of single period and double periods. Their remarkable distinction was the relatively longer competitive phase. The whole competitive phase consisted of manycircles (the three-day type and the four-day type). The suitable span of the preparatory phase in the basket- ball major league of men should be two months. The training time of the three-day type circle in the competitive phase was 3d or 2d,and that of the four-day type circle was 4d or 3d. The characteristics of thecompetitive readiness of the players,taking part in the major league of men,was waved. In controlling thecompetitive readiness of players the relationship between the phases and the circles should be well dealtwith.更多还原