节点文献

两种牙面干燥法对窝沟封闭剂脱落率的影响

A comparison of two tooth drying methods on sealant retention

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 万呼春胡德渝李少敏刘大维

【Author】 Wan Huchun, et al. Department of Preventive Dentistry ,College of Stomatology ,West China University of Medical Sciences

【机构】 华西医科大学口腔医学院口腔预防医学教研室

【摘要】 比较了使用压缩空气与使用洗耳球热空气干燥牙面对封闭剂脱落率的影响。结果表明:压缩空气干燥牙面较洗耳球热空气干燥牙面,封闭剂完全脱落率低;上颌磨牙远中腭沟、近中沟,差异有高度显著性(P<0.01),下颌磨牙面差异无显著性(P<0.05)。说明使用压缩空气干燥牙面有利于封闭剂的保留,特别对于不易操作的上颌磨牙影响更加明显,而对于能直视、易操作的下颌磨牙,使用洗耳球热空气干燥牙面也能达到较好的效果

【Abstract】 The sealant retention rates in two groups of subjects using two methods of air drying are reported. 145 middle school students were divided into two groups. Sealants were placed on the first molars of the subjects in each group by similar techniques except for the method of air dring the teeth. In the first groups compressed air was used and in the second air diring by means of a rubber chip blower. The three-year retention rates demonstrated a higher percentage of sealant retention in the compressed air group. This was partienlarly evident in the mesial and distal lingual fissures of the upper molars. No significant diference was observed however in the lower molars. These results indicate that provided the tooth in well isolated and carefully dried the chip blower can be effective in dring lower molar teeth. This has significant implications in rural and mountain areas of China where electricity and compresors are not available.

【关键词】 窝沟封闭干燥脱落率磨牙
【Key words】 Sealantdryingretentionmolar (Original article on Page 91 )
  • 【文献出处】 实用口腔医学杂志 ,JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL STOMATOLOGY , 编辑部邮箱 ,1996年02期
  • 【分类号】R783.2
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】72
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络