【摘要】 通过李果珍百分计数法和Tanner—Whitehouse（TW₂）骨龄评定方法的比较,结果显示李氏法骨龄与时间年龄较一致,TW₂骨龄落后于时间年龄,提示李氏法更适用于中国儿童,且李氏法简单,省时,更适合于临床应用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Differences in Li Guozhen’percentage and tanner - Whitehouse (TW2) methods in assessment skeletal age were compared in Shanghai children 7 -15 years of age. Results indicated that Li’s skeletal ages accorded with chronological ages and TW2’s skeletal ages were consistently lower than chronological ages. Li’s methhod is better for Chinese children. Li’s metocl is easier than TW2 in assessment skeletal age. So it is fitter cliical practice.更多还原