节点文献

方差组分估计方法的比较

COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING VARIANCE COMPONENTS

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘增廷张沅解春亭

【Author】 Liu Zengting, Zhang Yuan, Xie Chunting ( Beijing Agricultural University )

【机构】 北京农业大学北京农业大学

【摘要】 本文通过蒙特卡罗模拟产生的八个模拟资料比较了我国常用的方差分析法(不考虑场年季效应)、Henderson方法1、Henderson方法3、最大似然法、改进最大似然法与约束最大似然法。结果表明:方差分析法估计值偏差最大,而约束最大似然法的估计值最准确。

【Abstract】 Eight simulated data sets are generated by Monte Carlo simulation to compare the relative accuracy of methods for estimating variance components. These methods selected are Analysis of variance ( ANOVA ) which does not take the fixed herd-year-season effects into account, Henderson method 1 , Henderson method 3, Maximum Likelihood ( ML ) , Modified Maximum Likelihood(MOML ) and Restricted Maximum Likelihood ( REML ) . The simulation results indicate that the estimates of REML are most accurate and the estimates of ANOVA are most biased, compared with those of the other methods.

  • 【文献出处】 畜牧兽医学报 ,Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences , 编辑部邮箱 ,1989年04期
  • 【被引频次】6
  • 【下载频次】129
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络