节点文献

评价水稻品种抗稻瘟病性两种方法的比较

Comparison of Two Methods for Assessing Resistance to Rice Blast

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 何月秋曾小萍文艳华彭志平黄瑞荣

【Author】 He Yueqiu, Zeng Xiaoping, Wen Yanhua,Peng Zhiping and Huang Ruirong (Plant Protection Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

【机构】 江西省农业科学院植物保护研究所江西省农业科学院植物保护研究所

【摘要】 本文比较了用稻瘟病菌的一个单孢菌株代表一个生理小种测定品种抗病频率和不分小种而直接用多个单孢菌株测定品种的抗病频率的优缺点.指出前者因同一生理小种内各菌株致病力有差异,以及抽样的随意性,测得的品种抗优势小种数实际上是抗菌株数,后者克服了前者的缺点,并得到自然病圃病情的验证,但仍有不足之处,有待改进.

【Abstract】 The merits and demerits of the method used in testing the resistance frequency of rice cultivars to monoconidial isolates which represent various physiological races of Pyricularia oryzae Cav. were compared with that of testing the resistance frequency to a number of isolates which were not previously identified into races. Experiments showed that the former due to the randomness of sampling and. the great pathogenic differences among isolates of a single race, was just to test the number of the resisted isolates rather than the prevailing races. The latter, however, could be more reliable than the former and has been confirmed of more merits by the results from the natural disease nursery, although there still exist some demerits to be improved in the future.

【关键词】 生理小种菌株抗病频率
【Key words】 Physiological racesIsolatesResistance frequency
  • 【文献出处】 江西农业学报 ,Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi , 编辑部邮箱 ,1989年01期
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】27
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络