节点文献

IHA和SPA-ELISA检测华支睾吸虫病效果的比较

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS BETWEEN IHA AND SPA-ELISA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CLONORCHIASIS

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张耀璧王之怀胡万富罗俊平周莉吴维铎张在亮陈庆伟徐伏牛

【Author】 Zhang Yaobi, et al. Anhui Provincial parasitic disease Institute, Wuhu

【机构】 安徽省寄生虫病防治研究所安徽省寄生虫病防治研究所蒙城县卫生防疫站阜阳地区地方病防治站

【摘要】 本文报道了IHA和SPA-ELISA在实验室和现场同时检测华支睾吸虫病效果的比较。26份正常人和11份华支睾吸虫病人血清,IHA的阴性及阳性符合率分别为100%和90.9%;SPA—ELISA分别为92.3%和90.9%,两者符合率无显著差别。现场对比研究表明,IHA与粪检的阳性及阴性符合率分别为85.88%和70.58%;SPA-ELISA分别为90.6%和79.3%,两者阳性符合率无显著性差别,而阴性符合率的差别有高度显著性,提示SPA-ELISA现场诊断华支睾吸虫病比IHA更具有可信性。

【Abstract】 This paper reports the result of comparsion between IHA and SPAELISA for the diagnosis of clonorchiasis sinensis in the laboratory and field. The sera of 26 normal persons and 11 patients were tested in the laboratory. The negative and positive rates in SPA-ELISA were 92.39% and 90.9%, and IHA 100% and 90.9% respectively. Statistically significant differences did not exsist between the rates of SPA-ELISA and IHA. In the field, 809 sera in population were measured. The result showed that the negative and positive accord-rates between SPA-ELISA and stool test were 79.3% and 90.6%, and IHA 70.58% and 85.88% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two negative accordrates, but a significant difference was found between the two positive ones. It suggests that the result of SPA-ELISA for diagnosis of clonorchiasis sinensis in the field seems to be more believable than IHA.

  • 【文献出处】 安徽医学 ,Anhui Medical Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,1989年04期
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】11
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络