节点文献

流行性出血热病毒单克隆抗体的反向被动血凝和被动血凝抑制试验在诊断中的初步应用

USE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY SENSITIZED RED BLOOD CELL FOR REVERSE PASSIVE HEMAGGLUTINATION TEST AND REVERSE PASSIVE HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION TEST FOR RAPID DIAGNOSIS OF EPIDEMIC HEMORRHAGIC FEVER

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈伯权刘琴芝孙月英吴美英周国芳孟庆荣孙文宪齐明李泰然邢峥宋干

【Author】 Chen Boquan Liu Qinzhi Sun Yueying Wu Meiying Zhou Guofang Meng Qingrong Sun Uanxian Qi Ming Li Tairan Xing Zheng Son Gan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine; Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Institute of Biological Product of Beijing.

【机构】 中国预防医学科学院病毒学研究所中国医学科学院基础医学研究所北京生物制品研究所中国预防医学科学院病毒学研究所

【摘要】 本文用流行性出血热病毒单克隆抗体致敏羊血球,做反向被动血凝和被动血凝抑制试验。检查出血热病毒抗原和抗体,不仅敏感,性能稳定,而且操作简便、快速。

【Abstract】 Reverse passive hemagglutination(RPHA) and reverse passive hemagglu tination inhibition(RPHI) test were carried out by using monoclonal anti-body 25 1 sensitized red blood cell(M-RBC) to detect the antigen and anti -body of epidemic hemorrhagic fever virus(EHFV). The comparative results of RPHA and hemagglutination test(HA) of EHFV showed that RPHA was more sensitive and simpler than HA. M-RBC can be agglutinated by the antigen of EHFV either prepared by sucrose acetone method or saline extract method, but for HA the goose RBC can only be agglutinated by the antigen prepared by sucrose-acetone method. The titer of RPHA is on the average 2-4 times higher than HA. We also found that antigen for RPHA is better when low speed centrifugation (500 rpm/min) is used than high speed (10,000 rpm/min). We also compared the antibody titers of EHF pati ents by RPHI and IF method. The same positive rate was found by both method in 25 sera. RPHI was easier to carry out than IF. The M-RBC is stable at 37℃ for 7 days and at 4℃ for more than 90 days. The result can be read in 60 minutes.

  • 【文献出处】 病毒学报 ,Chinese Journal of Virology , 编辑部邮箱 ,1986年04期
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】17
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络