【摘要】 本文首先概括总结了我国人文地理学的兴废及其原因和背景,认为复兴是必要的、及时的。但复兴不是复旧,而是创新,创马克思列宁主义人文地理学之新。关于人文地理学对象问题,笔者认为把这门科学规定为研究“人地关系”之学,这是西方资产阶级地理学者的旧观念。文章着重论证“人地关系”这一人文地理学核心问题。笔者分析了什么是“地”,什么是“人”,两者发生什么“关系”?怎样发生关系?认为自然(地)“必须通过劳动过程然后作用于人类社会”。人是主体,地是客体,对人类社会发展起决定作用的是社会生产方式,是社会发展规律。因而,人文地理学是一门属于社会科学范畴的科学。更多还原

【Abstract】 This essay generalizes and summarizes the rise and fall of the ethno-geography of our country in connection with its cause and background and reaches the conclusion that this revival is necessary and timely. However, this revival should not be a restoration to the old school, but an effort aimed at blazing a new trail in the light of Marxism. The writer of this essay holds that the stipulation of this study as one on the "relationship between man and land" is an old concept of the bourgeois scholars in the west. In developing this key problem, the writer analyses what "land" is, what "man" is, what relationship exists between them and how this relationship comes into being, thus reaching the conclusion that "land can act upon human society only by means of the process of labour".Here man is the subject and land is the object. what bears the decisive function in the development of human society is the means of social production and the law of social development. Therefore, this is a science within the scope of social sciences.更多还原