【作者】 江俊伟；

【导师】 陈文新；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2014， 博士

【摘要】 本文以“刘永济与中国现代学术”为研究对象,以“时代与人”、“场域与人”“学科与人”为话题聚焦点,致力于对中国现代学术史上的著名学者刘永济进行系统研究。全文凡五章,分别以“学脉赓续”、“学缘辨析”、“学界生态”、“学术范式”与“学术遗响”为论述重心,依次展开。其中,“学脉赓续”、“学术范式”、“学术遗响”三大议题,主要着眼于中国现代学术进程这一纵向的历史维度；而“学缘辨析”与“学界生态”两大议题,则聚焦于20世纪上半叶中国现代学术界这一横向的历史截面。通过对纵横两个维度的考察,试图对刘永济的学术实践及成就给出一个初步的学术坐标定位。第一章以学术转型为切入点,将刘永济置于中国近现代学术转型期这一特定历史时段进行观察。就学术背景而言,家学与师承对刘永济学术气质与兴趣的影响,象征着传统式中国学人在学术根基方面的典型形态；而明德学堂、复旦公学、清华留美预备学校的求学经历对刘永济学术视野、知识结构的影响,则代表了20世纪上半叶中国学人在教育背景上的普遍现象。就学术语境而言,身处中国学术由传统向现代转型期内的刘永济,对中国文化与学术的命运走向有着独特的思考。他在表达方式、思想内核及学术方法等层面的“迂阔”,诠释了一位“文化保守主义”者的强烈使命感；他在学术理路、文化范式、学术指向等层面的“不合时宜”,则象征了“文化保守主义”者在20世纪中国学术进程中所必须承担的宿命。第二章以学缘关系为聚焦点,从刘永济与《学衡》、《湘君》等学术刊物的互动关系出发,对其早期学术活动及学缘结构进行辨析。《学衡》杂志与“学衡派”既是刘永济学术事业及学缘建构的重要起点,也是其发表学术意见与文化观点的基本平台。在私人友谊与文化理想的双重感召下,刘永济深深地卷入了与《学衡》相关的文化与学术交锋,也借助《学衡》的文化影响力初步奠定了自己的学界声誉。较之《学衡》而言,由刘永济出任社长的《湘君》与“湘君社”更能突显他个人的文化理想与姿态。《湘君》与《学衡》在文化论调上的一致性,彰显了刘永济的文化理想及其对“新文化运动”的态度；而《湘君》与《学衡》在题旨与风格等层面的差异,则诠释了刘永济清高“自愉”的文化姿态。第三章以学界生态样貌为发散点,将刘永济的学术活动与学界交游置于20世纪三四十年代的时空维度下加以观照。在国立武汉大学文学院这一学术空间中,“新派”苏雪林、朱东润、叶圣陶与“旧派”刘永济、刘博平等人的分歧、交往与是非,为了解刘永济与国立武汉大学文学院之间的互动关系提供了一个切入点。在学术交游群落这一学术空间中,无论是刘永济与梅光迪、陈寅恪、吴宓、吴芳吉的私人交谊,还是他与缪钺、夏承焘等人的学术往来,都为考察刘永济的学界地位、声誉及影响提供了参考性的例证。第四章以刘永济的古典文学研究实践为观照对象,侧重从学术理路与旨趣两个层面对刘永济的学术范式进行探讨,对其“用古典文学理论来检查古典文学作者和作品”的学术主张进行分析。就学术理路来说,以“孔门文学观”为代表的传统学术观念是左右刘永济学术研究的思维内核；以“知人论世”说为中心的传统学术方法则是主导刘永济古典文学研究实践的立论基点。就学术旨趣来说,无论是在视角选择上对“鉴赏之事”的偏重,还是在范式取向上对中国传统学术经典及治学路数的仿效,都显示了刘永济对传统学术路径的眷恋。第五章以刘永济的学术遗响为中心话题,对刘永济与他的弟子们展开基于学术史层面的观照。就师生关系而言,刘永济在弟子与后学们的反复追忆与重塑中,定格为恪守传统师道精神的师者形象；而刘永济师生之间的良性互动,也构成了20世纪学术传承的一道人文景观；就学术影响而言,程千帆、胡云翼等人在学术路径上与刘永济的异同,昭示着现代学术语境下学术传承的不同形态。更多还原

【Abstract】 The research object of this paper is the relationship of Liu Yongji and China modern academic. This paper make a tentative study on the Chinese modern famous scholar Liu Yongji, Which is focused on the relationship between the times and scholar, the field and scholar,the subject and scholars. The whole thesis consists of five chapters. They are respectively discussed the academic tradition, the study relationship, the academic ecology, the academic paradigm, the academic influence. Some chapters are focused on the longitudinal time dimension, which is mainly involved the Chinese modern academic process; and the other chapters are focused on the first half of the20th century Chinese modern academic history of the transverse section. Based on the investigation to these dimensions, is devoted to give a preliminary academic coordinates to the scholarly practices and achievement of Liu Yongji.The breakthrough point of the first chapter is the academic transfoumation of China. In terms of academic background, family and educational background influence on Liu yongji’s acdemic temperament and interest, which is a symbol of the traditional Chinese scholars in the academic foundation of typical form; and the education experience in mingde school, fudan public school, tsinghua preparatory school influence on yongji’s academic field of vision and knowledge structure, which represents the first half of the20th century Chinses economist of common phenomenon in education background. In terms of academic context, Liu Yongji is active in the period of Chinese modern academic transformation, and he has a unique thinking of the Chinese cultural and academia fate. On the one hand, he explained his strong task sense as a "cultural conservatism", which is embodied in the following respects:the way of expression, the thinking Kernel and academic methods. On the other hand, his inappropriate in the academic thought, cultural paradigm and academic point is a symbol of fate which is "cultural conservatism" must undertake in20th century Chinese academic process. The focal point of the second chapter is the study relationship. This chapter looks at Liu Yongji’s academic activities and his study relationship by investigating the relationship between Liu Yongji and the academic journals such as XUEHENG and XINGJUN. The Xueheng magazine and Xueheng School is a important starting point of the Liu Yongji’s academic career and his study relationship, but also is the basic platform of him to pubish academic opinion and cultural point of view. In the dual impelling private friendship and cultural ideal, Liu Yongji was deeply involved in the cultural and academic cxchange which is related to the Xueheng magazine, and also established his academic reputation with the help of his academic influence. Compared with the Xueheng magazine, the Xiangjun magazine and the Xiangjun ccmmunity which’s chief is Liu Yongji have more representative of his cultural ideal and attitude. The consistency in the cultural view between the Xiangjun magazine and the Xueheng magazine demonstrates Liu Yongji’s cultural ideal and his attitude to the "New Culture Movement",and the differences in the theme and style between the Xiangjun magazine and the Xueheng magazine is the interpretation of Liu Yongji’s lofty cultural attidude.The point of divergence of the third chapter is the academic ecology. This chapter discusses Liu Yongji’s academic activities and academic exchanges in the space-time of the20th Century thirty’s and forty’s. In the academic space of the National Wuhan University College of liberal arts, the differences, communication and entanglement between the progressives such as Su Xuelin, Zhu Dongrun and Ye Shengtao and the conservatives such as Liu Yongji and Liu Boping, which provides an breakthrough point for the interactive relationship between Liu Yongji and the National Wuhan University College of liberal arts. In the academic space of the academic communication community, both Liu Yongji and Mei Guangdi, Chen Yingque, Wu Mi, Wu Fangji’s personal friendship, or he and Miu Yue, Xie Chengtao’s academic exchanges, all contribute to the study of Liu Yongji’s academic status, reputation and influence.The research object of the fourth chapter is the practice of Liu Yongji’s research on Chinese classical literature. This chapter focuses on the discussion of the academic system of Liu Yongji both from the level of academic practice and academic interests, also analyzes Liu Yongji’s academic point of view of "with the classical theory to examine the classical authors and works". In terms of academic concept, the core of Liu Yongji’s academic thinking is the the Chinese traditional academic ideas which represented by the Confucian literary ideas; and the dominant view of his classics study practice is the traditional academic methods which is represented by the view of "Zhi Ren Lun Shi". In terms of academic interests, both focus on the perspective of appreciation, and the follow to the Chinese traditional academic classics and research route, which all implied Liu Yongji has a preference for the tradional academic path.The center topic of the fifth chapter is the academic influence. This chapter discusses Liu Yongji and his students from the perspective of academic history. In terms of the relationship between teachers and students, Liu Yongji was identified as abide by traditional terchers’s spiritual teacher image; and good shape the interaction between Liu Yongji and his students, also constitutes a20th Century academic inheritance of a cultural landscape. In terms of academic influence, the similarities and differences of Liu Yongji and his studens such as Cheng Qianfan, Hu Yunyi, shows different forms of academic experience of moderm academic context transfer.更多还原