【作者】 王启东；

【导师】 李宗勋；

【作者基本信息】 延边大学 ， 世界史， 2016， 博士

【摘要】 作为宗主国和藩属国的清朝和朝鲜之间的交聘持续了近260年,双方在宗藩体制下往来的交聘文书汗牛充栋,是古代国家与国家之间沟通、交流、关系体现的重要见证,也是国家之间相互往来的历史记载,表明了双方主从关系的差异和变迁,这种关系集中体现在双方外聘文书的类型、制撰、本文形式、管理、送达等各个方面,对双方交聘文书进行深入的比较研究,对朝鲜和清朝关系的细化研究及整体性把握有极其重要的学术价值。本文在梳理大量朝鲜和清朝交聘文书的基础上,通过对朝鲜和清朝交聘文书的比较研究,为历史文书的重要历史文化遗产价值给予重要的肯定,探究双方文书在各自历史发展继承中的重要作用乃至对当今政治、经济、文化等各项建设事业的有益借鉴价值,为相关历史研究提供重要的参考价值。论文共包括以下几部分：第一部分是绪论,主要阐述了论文研究的目的和意义、论文研究的相关研究现状、论文的研究内容和研究方法；第二部分是对朝鲜与清朝的交聘文书的概述,主要内容包括交聘文书的概念界定；交聘文书的种类构成,包括外交文书、国书文书、条约文书等；交聘文书在中国、朝鲜历史演变构成等；清朝对朝鲜的交聘文书类型分析；朝鲜对清朝的交聘文书类型分析；朝鲜和清朝交聘文书的类型比较分析；第三部分论述了朝鲜与清朝交聘文书的本文格式比较。主要内容包括朝鲜对清朝交聘文书的用纸要求、本文书写格式分析；清朝对朝鲜交聘文书的材料要求、本文书写格式分析、抬头书写规范和避讳制度分析；朝鲜和清朝交聘文书的本文格式比较分析；第四部分论述了朝鲜与清朝交聘文书的制撰比较。主要内容包括朝鲜交聘文书的制撰情况,包括其制撰机构和制撰程序的阐述；清朝交聘文书的制撰情况,包括其制撰机构和制撰程序的阐述；朝鲜和清朝交聘文书的制撰人员、制撰机构和制撰程序的比较分析；第五部分论述了朝鲜与清朝交聘文书的管理比较。主要内容包括朝鲜对清朝交聘文书的管理机构和管理制度分析：清朝对朝鲜交聘文书的管理机构和管理制度分析；朝鲜和清朝双方在交聘文书管理机构和管理制度的比较分析；第六部分论述了朝鲜与清朝交聘文书的送达比较。主要内容包括朝鲜对清朝交聘文书的送达情况,包括送达使节的类型、送达人员的组成、送达路线的管理和送达程序的管理情况；清朝对朝鲜交聘文书的送达情况,包括送达使节的类型、送达人员的管理情况和送达程序的管理情况；清朝和朝鲜双方送达情况的比较分析即送达人员、送达程序和送达礼仪的比较分析；论文的最后部分是结语部分。综合论述本论文在朝鲜和清朝的交聘文书比较悠久的价值及其意义。本论文在广泛借鉴前辈学者研究成果的基础上,以历史学研究方法为基础,运用文体学知识、文书学知识、管理学知识、文献学知识和语言学知识,通过对原始档案、文献资料的深入研究和大量的交聘文书文本分析,从朝鲜和清朝之间交聘文书的比较研究入手,对双方交聘文书的使用类型、文本书写形式、抬头规定和避讳制度、制撰机构和程序、文本管理、交聘文书的送达及其在双方外交和国家关系等方面的重要作用和影响进行较为深入的探究,系统梳理双方交聘文书的使用情况,为该方面的研究提供重要的参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the suzerain vassal state of the Qing Dynasty between Korea, the Diplomatic Exchange lasted nearly 260 years。There are voluminous books of the diplomatic exchange documents of both sides in the Patriachal-Vassal system which is the important witness of ancient time country and country to communicate, exchange, the relationship, is also the history record of countries linkup。It is show the difference and vicissitudes between both the master-slave relationship。This relationship is reflected in bilateral about the external documents types, written by, the system, management, service and other aspects to conduct in-depth comparative study on both sides of the diplomatic exchange documents, It has a very important of the academic value of the relationship between Korea and Qing Dynasty refinement research and overall grasp for the further study.The thesis is based on a large number of diplomatic exchange documents Korea and the Qing Dynasty to pay a retainer, Comparative study on the comparison of the diplomatic exchange documents of the Korea and the Qing Dynasty, what for a well-deserved recognition for the important historical documents of the important historical and cultural, it played an important role in their respective historical development, even had the useful reference value for today’s political, economic, cultural and other construction what to provide important reference value for related historical research。Several parts are included in this dissertation as follows:The first part is the introduction, mainly expounds on the study purpose and significance of this thesis, related research content and the studying methods。The second part is the an overview of the diplomatic exchange documents of the Korea and the Qing Dynasty, The main contents include the definition of the concept of the diplomatic exchange documents; types of instruments for diplomatic exchange documents, including diplomatic documents, credentials and treaty and so on; the diplomatic exchange documents in bilateral history evolution and composition; the analysis of Qing Dynasty’s diplomatic exchange documents type of Korea; the analysis of Korean diplomatic exchange documents type of Qing Dynasty; the comparative analysis of the type of the diplomatic exchange documents of the Korea and the Qing Dynasty.The third part expounds the comparison of the diplomatic exchange documents format of the Korean and the Qing Dynasty。 Its main content includes Korean diplomatic exchange documents paper requirements on the use of the Qing Dynasty、analysis of text format; the material requirements of the Qing Dynasty on the diplomatic exchange documents of the Korea、analysis of text format、began of article writing code and the analysis of Taboo system; a comparative analysis of the diplomatic exchange documents text format of the Korea and the Qing Dynasty.The fourth part discusses the comparison by Korea and Qing Dynasty diplomatic exchange documents writing. Its main content includes situation of Korean diplomatic exchange documents writing, includes elaborated on writing institutions and program; situation of Qing Dynasty diplomatic exchange documents writing, includes elaborated on writing institutions and program; comparative analysis of writing personnel-, writing institutions and writing program of Korea and Qing Dynasty.The fifth part discusses, the diplomatic exchange documents management and comparison of the Korean and the Qing Dynast. Its main content includes the analysis of Korean diplomatic exchange documents administration and management system of the Qing Dynasty; the analysis of Qing Dynasty administration and management system of diplomatic exchange documents of the Korea; A comparative analysis of the diplomatic exchange documents management system and the management system between the Korea and the Qing Dynasty.The sixth part discusses the comparison of the delivery of the diplomatic exchange documents express between the Korea and the Qing Dynasty. Its main content includes that diplomatic exchange documents delivery of the Korea to the Qing Dynasty; includes the type of service envoys、composition of envoys service、management of service route and Management of service procedures; diplomatic exchange documents delivery of the Qing Dynasty to the Korea; includes the type of service envoys、composition of envoys service、 management of service route and Management of service procedures; the comparative analysis of the service between the Qing Dynasty and Korea that the transporter the express serve and etiquette of express.The final part of this paper is the epilogue. It also gives a synthesis of the value and significance of the relatively long history of the diplomatic exchange documents of the Korea and the Qing Dynasty of this thesis.This thesis is based on the research results of the predecessors, In the method of research, taking history as the foundation, using the knowledge of stylistics, document knowledge, knowledge management, literature knowledge and linguistic knowledge, through in-depth study of the original file, literature, and a large number of diplomatic exchange documents, the text analysis, start a comparative study on the comparison of the documents between the Korea and the Qing Dynasty, on both sides of the diplomatic exchange documents types, writing form, began of article writing code and taboo system, institutions and procedures, written text management, the diplomatic exchange documents delivery of the service and its important role and influence in the bilateral foreign and national relations, Systematizing to hackle bilateral diplomatic exchange documents, which may lay the important foundation for the study.更多还原