节点文献
当代中国犯罪学研究
Study on the Criminology in Contemporary China
【作者】 岳平;
【导师】 李瑜青;
【作者基本信息】 上海大学 , 社会学, 2011, 博士
【副题名】一种知识社会学的分析
【摘要】 本文以犯罪学知识为研究对象,以知识社会学的分析方法,阐释我国当代犯罪学知识在改革开放三十一年问的变迁及变迁过程中的知识表达及取向中所蕴含的社会诉求。我国犯罪学知识的生产和生产者在犯罪学研究中的问题意识和研究主题并非是独立社会意识之外的,社会意涵始终影响着知识的变迁。社会变迁过程中不断创造不同的时代命题。因此,对于我国的犯罪学来说,更多的是知识变迁中.呈现出特定时期社会意涵的犯罪学问题意识的命题和使命。同时知识呈现的是加入到犯罪学研究中的知识生产者对知识的理念和态度也在发生变化。在不同的历史时期,知识变迁与社会意涵的动态性规律已嵌入在了研究者主观与客观的交互反思性中。正是在知识变迁中展现了社会意涵,使知识的发展有了可能。正因如此,在知识生产的场域中,犯罪学研究者的构建研究范式的努力及犯罪学的可能知识贡献,也根植于自身的社会场所。犯罪学的研究主题和问题意识在不同时期呈现了不断的转向。这些转向也是知识生产者精神旅途的变迁过程。八十年代犯罪学的知识生产沿袭了传统的犯罪学研究范式,隐含的是单一的知识逻辑并历经了与传统的范式和知识逻辑娘变和博弈的过程:九十年代犯罪学的知识生产则是张扬学术品格,行走在学科自信与独立的精神旅途中;这一时期是与传统的知识逻辑呈现对峙的学科张力。知识场域也碰触了相应的处遇;进入二十一世纪的犯罪学知识生产则是更为刻求学科基质的独立品格和谋求创新的学术精神内核。表达的是在社会转型不l司时期对自身学术品格和贡献的关注。而这一过程,是我国犯罪学发展实践的精神旅途,历经了从单一的政治意涵为知识内核的知识生产,到追求学术性内核以及至构建政治与学术二元结构的知识表达,这一过程交织着犯罪学知识与社会契合的反思性建构。呈现了犯罪学知识的学科、知识与社会的关系及知识与社会贡献的规律。在犯罪学知识变迁过程中,犯罪学的知识功能和社会角色也在发生转向性变化。犯罪学知识功能的多元化使研究者对社会角色的认同感也正在经历更为深刻的转变。这些转变既是中国社会转型与变迁的结果,也为构建我国犯罪学范式、探寻犯罪学生产的创新机制提供了可能。
【Abstract】 In thin paper, the research object is criminological knowledge, based on the analysis of sociology of knowledge. The paper attempts to interpret the change of the contemporary criminological knowledge during the past three decades, as well as knowledge expression in the carne process. And Social demands inherent to the values.The main research topics and prohlcln awareness pursued by Chinese criminological researchers, cant be independent from the social awareness. which affects the change of knowledge all the time. So, for the Chinese criminological rcsearch, they focus more on the mission and question of criminological problem awareness that has been showed by the social awareness at a specitic period. At the same time, in terms of knowledge, the attitude and notion of the criminological researchers, who are participating in the research, are changing. In ditferent historical period, dynamic law of social awareness and chanbe of knowledge have been embedded in to the objective refection of researchers, as well as subjective reflection. During the period of change of knowledge, which demonstrates social implications, making it possible for the development of knowledge. For this reason, in the field of knowledge production, Criminological researcher’s efforts to build a researching paradigm. as well as the possibility of knowledge contribution to criminology,have already rooted in their own social fieldThe subjects of criminology study and the awareness of problems have changed in various ways in different periods. which show the change of the knowledge producers" inner world. In 1980’s, the production of criminology knowledge inherited the traditional torn of criminology study. It followed the single logic of knowledge and changed and gamed with the traditional paradigm and logic. In the 1990’s, researchers witnessed the booming of the production of criminology knowledge- In this period, researchers upheld the quality of academic research and became confident and independent. It equals to the traditional logic of knowledge, and the field of knowledge also found its related context. In the 21st century, the production of criminology knowledge focuses more on the academic independence and innovation, and concerns more about its academic quality and contribution in the different stages of social transition. In this period, the development of cnlnlnology in China can be divided into two stages: tirst, the knowledge production that takes political consideration as its single core; second, the knowledge expression that takes academic consideration as its core and try to construct the dualistic structure including political and academic consideration. These two stages show the rules of the criminology of knowledge itself, the relationship between knowledge ancf society, as well as their contribution.With the change of criminology knowledge, its functions and social roles have also undergone dramatic change; the same is true of the divcrsitication of its functions and the researchers’ acceptance of social roles. All these changes are caused by China’s social transition and change, which enable us to construct the paradignn of China’s criminology, and explore the innovation mechatism of the production of criminology knowledge.