【作者】 马小洁；

【导师】 张子刚；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 管理科学与工程， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 高校院系领导干部及领导班子的考核一直是各高校关注的重要问题之一。传统考核方法简便易行,但指标抽象,难以量化,指标权重确定也具有很大的随意性,评委主观偏差和失误在所难免,导致实际工作中对院系干部的考核易流于主观判断。因此建立科学公正公开的考核体系势在必行。本文的目的是针对高校院系干部考核的特点,利用多种统计分析方法分别建立高校院系领导干部及领导班子考核指标体系,提出高校院系领导干部及领导班子考核的方式和方法,并进行实证分析,进而为高校院系干部的考核提供参考。本文首先阐述了高校院系干部考核的意义和基本原则,从考核前的准备、考核实施过程及考核结果运用三个方面分析了院系干部考核的基本程序,并重点分析了院系干部考核的内容和方式。其次分析了高校院系干部考核指标构建的原则和思路;在文献分析和重点访谈的基础上整理出了高校院系干部考核的70条要素,并通过重要度分析、分项对总项相关分析和鉴别度分析,精练了考核要素;对精练的考核要素进行了分类,对每类考核要素进行因子分析,并进行了信度和效度分析;建立了高校院系干部考核指标体系,给出了指标的考核要点。在此基础上利用多准则群决策方法对高校院系干部进行了院级考核,包括利用多准则群决策方法确定高校院系干部考核指标的权重,分析高校院系干部的群评过程和自评过程及对群评和自评结果的比较,同时利用理想点法分析了高校院系干部的互评过程,并对互评结果进行了灵敏度分析。接下来对高校院系干部校级考核方法进行了研究,利用模糊AHP法和群决策方法确定考核指标的权重,对单个院系干部进行了模糊综合评判,并比较分析了不同综合评价合成算子对考核结果的影响;利用模糊理想点法对多个院系干部进行了校级考核,给出了排序,利用熵权法对考核结果进行了综合排序,并进行了灵敏度分析。然后对高校院系领导班子的考核进行了研究,分析了院系领导班子现状及院系领导班子考核的功能和作用,构建了高校院系领导班子考核的指标体系,研究了高校院系领导班子的院级考核方法,利用AHP确定指标权重,对院系领导班子进行了自评和群评,并对评价结果进行了比较分析;研究了高校院系领导的校级考核方法,用模糊AHP确定指标权重,用模糊理想点法对五个领导班子进行了评价,并对评价结果进行了灵敏度分析。最后,从提高考核数据的信度、构建高校院系干部考核的激励和约束机制以及完善考核结果的评定与运用三个方面提出了提高高校院系干部考核效果的措施。更多还原

【Abstract】 The college middle-level officials and their group assessment has been one of the concentrated problems in the universities for long time. Although the traditional assessment is easily operated, its norms are intricate and are difficult to quantify, the weight of indexes is usually decided randomly. Thus the juries’ subjective bias and error is inevitable, and the middle-level official assessment in practice tends to be subjective. For further progress, it is imperative to build a scientific, fair and open assessment system. Aiming at the characterizations of the assessment, this dissertation built various index systems with different statistical analysis methods, respectively, proposed the models and methods for the college middle-level official and their group assessment. The empirical analyses were further indicated to their validity. All these results would be expected to provide reference for the college middle-level official and their group assessment.The significance and basic principle for the college middle-level official and their group assessment were suggested initially in this dissertation. The routine of the middle-level official assessment was analyzed in three steps as assessment preparation, implementation and results application. The contents and methods of the middle-level official assessment were particularly clarified in this section.Then, the rules and ideas to build the indexes of the middle-level official assessment were analyzed. Based on literature summarization and key interview, 70 essential factors of the college middle-level official assessment were found to generally represent. With the help of significance analysis, item-to-total correlation analysis and identification analysis, these 70 assessment factors can be effectively concentrated. After classification, each of these concentrated factors was elemental analyzed, reliability and validity analyzed. Therefore, a college middle-level official assessment index system was built and the key assessment points were given.Based on the indexes, a college-level assessment was subsequently made for the middle-level officials with the multi-criteria group decision-making method, which included determining the weight of the assessment index, analyzing and comparing the process of group-assessment and self- assessment of the middle-level officials. Concurrently, the process of the college middle-level official peer-assessment was penetrated by ideal point method, and their results sensitivity was validated to be effective.Next, the assessment methods in the college-level were systematically studied. With the fuzzy AHP method and group decision-making method to determine the weights of assessment indexes, single middle-level official was evaluated on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Various comprehensive evaluations to synthesis operators were compared to indicate their effects. With the fuzzy ideal point method, several middle-level officials were assessed to their sort order in the university-level. With the entropy method, the integrated sort of the assessment was listed and the sensitivity analysis was made.Then, the research on the group of the college-level assessment was provided. Based on the analysis of group statue and assessment functions and effects, the index systems in the group of college-level assessment were built; and the assessment methods were studied. Based on the weight from AHP method, the self-assessment and group-assessment in the college-level were compared to their results. Furthermore, the university-level assessment method for college middle-level officials was studied. With the fuzzy AHP method to decide the index weight, five groups were evaluated by fuzzy ideal point method and the results were sensitivity analyzed.Based on the above studies, this dissertation finally proposed the measures to improve the assessment results in three aspects; improving the reliability of the assessment data, building inspire and inhibit mechanisms for college-level assessment, and completing the result evaluations and applications.更多还原