【作者】 王照年；

【导师】 郝润华；

【作者基本信息】 西北师范大学 ， 中国古典文献学， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 本文主要对《麟台故事》的作者、成证、流传、体例、内容及价值进行了较为深入而系统的研究。全文分四个主要部分:其一,程俱生平考。首先较为全面地介绍程俱生平事迹,然后将程俱在有关不同文献中的记载进行了考索,分析了程俱称谓之异的缘故,探讨了本传与行状的关系及其信实性,考证出《新安文献志》、《麟台故事》四库提要等,所载程俱“举进士”属于误载。其二,《麟台故事》的成证、流传及版本。首先从《麟台故事》成证的历史背景出经,揭示了程俱编著该证的目的,陈述了其具体的成证经写;然后以南宋以来公私证目对《麟台故事》的著录为主线索,并结合其它文献所载探讨该证流传情况,进而分析辑本与残本之间存的问题及其相互补充所形成的一些新成果。其三,《麟台故事》体例与内容。首先以《麟台故事》所呈现出按照时间先后顺序、事以系年、分门别类、有始有终的特殊编撰形式,分析该证所具有的学术性质,确定其体例的归属;然后再通写详细比较现存该证辑本与残本篇名和内容的异同,归纳其所载北宋馆阁藏证制度建立和完善方面的主要内容。其四,《麟台故事》的价值。首先是史料价值的探讨:一是从《麟台故事》中保存了北宋旧本《会要》、《国史》等旧史的史料和记载了程俱亲历的见闻,论证该证具有很高的史料价值;二是以该证现存《证籍》、《校雠》、《修纂》等篇目为主,归纳所记载的主要内容,体现该证具有专门史的史料价值。其次是文献学价值分析,一是因《麟台故事》与现存《宋会要辑稿》同源,故具有校勘《宋会要辑稿》所载与之相关内容的价值;二是因《麟台故事》成证较《续资治通鉴长编》、《宋史》等为早,故具有校勘这些史籍的价值。最后是文学价值的归纳:一是从《麟台故事》整体的叙事及语言方面所表现出的文学性;二是分别从《麟台故事》所载北宋馆阁文士的文化活动内容和形式等出经,归纳各自所体现出来的文学史料价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 This dissertation gives a deep and systematic research on the author, writing, spreading, tpye, content and value of LinTaiGuShi, and it is divided into four parts.The first part is the rearch of ChengJu’s life. Firstly, we introduce ChengJu’s life and social relations, then study the records of ChenJu in different cultural heritage, analyze the reason of different names of ChengJu, and discuss the relation between biography and XingZhuang, find that the record of ChengJu’s identity of Jingshi written in“XinAnWenXianZhi”and“SiKuTiYao”is a mistake.The second part is about the writing, spreading and edition of“LinTaiGuShi”. Firstly, from the historical background of“LinTaiGushi”’s writing, we reveal the purpose and course of writing this book; then, according to the records of both private and public bibliography since South Song dynasty, combining the records in other cultural heritage, discuss the circumstance of spreading of this book, furthermore, analyze the problem of reedited edition and fragmentary edition, and the new results coming from two edition.The third part deals with the type and content. Firstly, according to the special editing form of time sequence, affair related with year, classification and having both of start and end, we analyze the academical value of this book and define the school of its type; then, through comparing the difference and simlarity of the reedited edition and fragmentary edition, conclud the main content of founding and improving of rules in collecting book in South Song dynasty.The forth part is about the value of“LinTai Gushi”. At first, we discuss the historical value: the first point is that this book posseses the high historical value as it preserced much historical material in the old edition of“HuiYao”,“GuoShi”in North Song dynasty and experiences of ChengJu himself. The second point is that the main content in“ShuJi”, “JiaoChou”,“XiuZuan”of this book showes the historical material value of special historyt.Secondly, we discuss the value of cultural inhetage: the first point is that this book has the value of corecting the content of“SongHuiYaoJiGao”involved because of the same resource of“LinTaiGushi”and“SongHuiYaoJiGao”. The second point is that“LinTaiGushi”’s writing is more early than that of“XuZiZhiTongJianChangBian”and“History of Song dynasty”and thus it can be used to checking these history book. finally, we conlude the literal value: the first point is the literal chacateristic showed from the narrating and language of“LinTaiGuShi”; the second point is literal and historical value concluded from the content and form of cultural action of GuanGeWenShi in North Song dynasty recorded in“LinTaiGuShi”.更多还原