【作者】 王淑滨；

【导师】 田也壮；

【作者基本信息】 哈尔滨工业大学 ， 企业管理， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 中国经济体制改革的巨大成就,给中国高等教育的发展既带来了机遇又带来了挑战。为了顺应政治发展、经济发展、社会发展和全球化的时代要求,高校的定位已经发生了质的飞跃。但是相比经济的发展而言,教育体制改革的步伐仍然有所落后,高校尤为明显。因此,研究高等学校的评价,正确地衡量高校在教学、科研和服务方面为社会所作出的贡献,促进高校在社会价值增值的过程中的协调有序、良性地发展,一方面有助于高校明确自身的发展状况,找准定位,另一方面有助于解决中国学校发展与社会需求不一致的结构性矛盾。本文首先立足于系统的视角分析了高等学校的职能,依据其职能将高等学校的系统构成分为人才培养、科学研究和社会服务三个子系统,据此刻画了高等学校复杂性、开放性和非线性的系统特征。通过研究高等学校职能的演变过程,界定了高等学校社会价值和社会价值增值(Social Value-added,简称SVA)的概念,将协同学理论、自组织理论和经济价值增值理论( Economic Value-added,简称EVA)作为分析高等学校社会价值增值机理和价值评价的理论基础并建立了系统的分析框架。结合高等学校分类的含义、标准和方法,将高等学校分为研究型、教学科研型和教学型三类,分别研究了各类型大学的系统协同特性,确定了在不同类型大学里人才培养、科学研究和社会服务三个子系统所占的权重。借鉴EVA理论的研究范式,提出了高等学校SVA协同测度的基本思想,即要站在社会的角度来评价高校,高校一切活动价值的高低都取决于它对社会贡献的多少。提出了以高等学校的系统协同度的高低来衡量SVA的大小。分析了高等学校序参量的特性,并使用基于探索图的序参量定性求解的方法确定了高等学校的序参量。遵循科学性、实用性、数据易获得性的原则,使用协同学的方法构建了协同评价测度模型。分别就研究型大学、教学科研型大学及教学型大学选取代表性学校,采集三所学校2001年至2007年的数据对高等学校SVA的协同评价测度模型进行了的应用。分别分析各高校的全面有序度发展趋势并进行了比较,对不同类型高校的发展路径给出了合理的解释。最后使用价值创造整体模式的方法,将高等学校人才培养、科学研究和社会服务三个子系统社会价值增值的过程归结为协作、创新、控制、竞争四个驱动因素影响的结果,结合我国高等学校的特点,提出了改善各个子系统SVA的策略。本文从系统的角度研究高等学校,从社会价值的视角上提出了SVA的评价标准,利用协同评价测度模型将其量化;根据评价结果,使用价值创造整体模式的方法从宏观与微观两方面提出中国高等学校社会价值增值的策略,为中国高等学校的发展和高等教育体制的改革提供了思路与途径。更多还原

【Abstract】 Great achievements of Chinese economic system reform bring forth both opportunities and challenges to Chinese higher education. In response to political development, economic development, social development and globalization, institution of higher education have achieved a qualitative leap for their orientation. However, compared with the development in economy, the pace of system reform in education is relatively lagged. For this purpose, it is necessary to study the evaluation of institution of higher education in such a way that contributions made by them in education, scientific research and social services can be measured correctly, in particular on whether they develop in a harmonious, ordered and sound manner during social value-added process. This will help them find out the development goal and orient themselves correctly, also solve the inconsistent structural contradiction between Chinese schools development and social demand.In this paper we firstly analyze the functions of institution of higher education from the systematic perspective, and according to their functions, set their System Constitution as three subsystems, namely talent development, scientific research and social service. Accordingly, systematic characters such as complexity, openness and non-linear are described. We define social value and social value-added (shortly called SVA) of institution of higher education by studying the evolutional process of their functions, and utilizes synergetics theory, self-organization theory and EVA theory as the theoretical basis for the analysis social value-added mechanism and value evaluation, and establishes a systemic analysis framework. In combination with the meaning, standard and methods of the classification of institution of higher education, we classify institution of higher education as research, teaching-research and teaching-oriented universities, and determine the weight of different types of institution of higher education in three subsystems such as talent cultivation, scientific research and social service by respectively studying systematic synergetic characteristics of various universities. Drawing lessons from the research paradigm of EVA theory, we put forward basic thoughts of SVA synergetic measurement in institution of higher education, that is to say, evaluate institution of higher education from the social perspective and the value of various actions made by institution of higher education depends on their contributions to the society. Also, measuring SVA by degree of system synergetics in institution of higher education is proposed. We also analyze the characteristics of sequential parameter in institution of higher education, and determine the sequential parameter in a qualitative solution manger by using Schematic Diagram based sequential parameter. Synergetic evaluation measurement model is constructed based on the principle of science, practicability, data accessibility and the methods according to synergetics. Typical universities are respectively selected according to Research University, teaching- research University and teaching-oriented University. And the data sampled from these three universities from 2001 to 2007 is applied to SVA synergetic evaluation measurement model in institution of higher education. We separately analyze and compare all-around and ordered trends of various institution of higher education, and give rational explanation to development path of institution of higher education of different types. At the end of this paper, social value-added process of three subsystems, i.e. talent cultivation, scientific research and social service, resolve into the product due to four driving factors of collaboration, innovation, control and competition; in combination with the characters of Chinese institution of higher education, we come up with the strategy of improving various subsystem SVA.This paper studies Chinese institution of higher education from the systematic view, and put forward SVA evaluation standard from the perspective of social value that is quantized in accordance with synergetic evaluation measurement model. According to the results, we put forward macro and micro social value-added strategy of Chinese institution of higher education by using Value-Creating-Integration Mode, which provides approach and path for development in Chinese institution of higher education and reform in higher education system.更多还原