【作者】 赵智敏；

【导师】 李良荣；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 新闻学， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 《改革开放30年中国新闻学之演进》把刚刚过去的30年间中国新闻学的再生、发展和变化作为考察对象,通过对其所涉及的各类学术研究成果,包括学术活动、学术文献、研究方法以及学术思潮等的阐述和分析,来展现中国新闻学在这30年间的进步。任何知识的生产都是由在特定历史条件下的人进行的,而人的活动一时一刻也不可能脱离开他(或她)所生存的环境。所以,在研究30年间中国新闻学的过程中本文重点是从研究主体的视角来加以审视的,从而再现在特定环境下的中国新闻学的知识生产:研究者在对新闻学学术精神的追寻中实现对于中国新闻学的重建,进而勾勒出改革开放30年间中国新闻学发展的进路。本研究分期的标准是基于这样的理念:新闻学是一门与新闻实践密切联系的应用学科,所以,30年间中国新闻改革实践进程中滋生出来的问题需要新闻学去解答,新闻学在理论上的一次次突破又不断为新闻实践丌拓进路。在与实践密切互动的过程中,新闻学也在丰富和完善着自身。所以,本文是以这30年间中国新闻改革给新闻学提出的重大现实问题作为分期依据的。基于以上标准,本文的分期呈现出这样的脉络:多元功能的认可(1978——1988年)一舆论导向的重视(1989——1991)一双重属性的确认(1992——2001)——公共利益的显现(2002——2008)。在不断回答由实践提出的重大问题为中国新闻改革开路的过程中,中国新闻学自身也在经历着重建、反思和由党报本位向新闻本位转变及创新发展的学术探索之旅。30年的中国新闻学演进,是理论的突破不断为新闻改革实践开路的过程,也是中国新闻学在经历多年的苍白之后浓墨重彩重建自身的过程。本论文的主要内容如下:改革开放30年中国新闻学研究的前提和依据:我国无产阶级新闻学研究,发端于本世纪20年代,经历1942年的延安新闻界整风和1956年的报纸改革,以党报为本位的新闻学体系初具雏形。在《人民日报》改版的过程中,新闻学研究还一度呈现出活跃的景象。然而,随着1957年反右派斗争的扩大化波及新闻界,新闻学术讨论被迫中止。新闻学术研究在此后二十多年间,成为让人望而生畏一个的禁区。可以说,从共和国诞生到十一届三中全会之前,中国新闻学几近一片荒芜。第一章从1978—1988近10年间,这是30年来中国新闻学理论中对于新闻事业功能多元化的认可期,也是中国的新闻学才得以从废墟中再生的重要时期:批判旧的腐朽的法西斯新闻学,反思和改造传统新闻学,突破多年的政治禁区,确立新闻学的核心概念,以开放的眼光寻求研究方法革新的路径,在重建新闻学的过程中,一次次实现自身的飞跃,从而为多年来视宣传为唯一之天命的中国新闻业提供了解放自身的理论武器,释放出压抑太久的发展能量,向着现代新闻业进发。第二章是从1989—1991,这近三年的时间,是中国学界在经历近10年思想大解放之后的重要反思期。此间,不论是对于新闻学研究指导思想的反思,还是学术史的书写以及对于研究方法的思考,或者是对于上10年新闻理论研究和新闻改革实践的反思,都是基于这样一个前提,即如何创建一个适合中国国情的新闻学体系。而对这一问题的思考成了改革开放30年中国新闻学演进历程中的一个承上启下的转折点,它让学者们开始审视上10年的研究,也给未来的研究定下了基调。第三章从1992——2001的10年,其间中国新闻学重大理论问题——新闻事业的属性研究有了重大突破,即双重属性的确立,从而为中国日益深入的新闻改革实践提供了强大的理论锐器。同时,中国新闻学理论体系的建构也“已取得了明显进展”,实现了从“党报”本位、“新闻事业”本位向“新闻”本位的飞跃。此间,中国新闻学在研究主题的多元化上也向前迈进了一大步。第四章是从2002年到2008年。6年来,中国新闻事业的公共属性正在显现,这是中国新闻改革实践再次提交给学界的急需破解的一个重大的现实理论问题。此前,新闻学界对于中国新闻事业性质的定位经历了一个由单一的意识形态属性向包涵着企业属性的“双重属性”的质变。基于中国新闻学要与时俱进创新发展的欲求,学者们对于中国新闻学进行了全面检视、自觉遵循新闻学研究规范的同时,还对已现端倪的“方法崇拜”加以反思。此外,在新闻学理论体系构建上也取得了一些成果。当然,对于中国新闻学来说,不论是概念的科学、体系的完善、理论的突破还是方法的科学化,都还有艰巨的任务需要去完成。要看到,中国新闻学还有太多的内容需要去修补:缺少与世界同行对话的能力,缺少与其它学科的平起平坐的认同。总之,30年来“新闻学研究还有很多问题和不足”,这些都需要未来中国新闻学的创新发展去革新。更多还原

【Abstract】 "The Evolution Of Chinese Journalism During ’30 Years OfReform And Opening-up’ (1978——2008)" just put the renewablesources development and change as the object of study in the past 30 years of Chinese journalism,through its various academic involved in research, including academic activities, academic literature, research methods and academic ideas, such as research, to display the progress in the past 30 years.Any knowledge production all is by all carries on under the specific historical condition person , and the activities of people can not be separated from his (or her) living environment. Therefore, in 30 years the process of Chinese journalism in this paper are from the perspective of the main body to be examined, thus to reappear the production of Chinese journalism knowledge under the specific environment: in the study for the academic pursuit of the spirit of Chinese journalism for the implementation of the redevelopment study, which outlined the reform and opening up 30 years the evolution of Chinese journalism into the road.Phases of this study is based on the criteria of such philosophy: journalism is in close contact with the news of the practice of applied science, therefore, questions bred out of the practice need to be answered in the perspective of journalism, the breakthroughs of journalism theory continue removing obstacles in the practice of journalism. Journalism is also enriched and perfected itself on the way of its practice in close interaction with practice. Therefore, the phases of this article is based on the important questions from Chinese journalism practice during "30 years of reform and opening—up (1978--2008)" .Based on the above criteria, this article shows the phases of the sequence of this: Multi-dimensional function approval of journalism (1978 - 1988) -Value of guidance of public opinion (1989 - 1991) --Confirmation of dual attribute of journalism (1992 - 2001) -- - The appearance of public interest (2002 - 2008). In replied unceasingly issues raised by journalism reform and pave the way for it, The Chinese Journalism itself was also experiencing the reconstruction, reflection, and transformation and the innovation development travel of academic exploration by the party newspaper standard to news standard. 30 year Chinese journalism evolution, was the theory breakthrough unceasingly for the news reform practice opening process, also was the Chinese journalism after years of strong pale color re-wipe the process of rebuilding itself.The present paper primary coverage is as follows:The study premise and basis of Chinese Journalism during "30 years of reform and opening—up (1978--2008)" : originated from 20’s of the 20th century , the proletariat Journalism Research in our country experienced the Yan’an journalistic circles rectification in 1942 and newspaper reform in 1956, later had its initially embryonic form of party-based information system study . The reform of the newspaper to In the reform of "People’s Daily", journalism research also once presented the active scene. However, with expansion of anti-rightist struggle in journalistic circles in 1957, the news academic discussion was compelled to stop. Since then, the news scholarly research in the two decades has become a taboo it daunting. It can be said that before the birth of the Third Plenary Session of China journalism research was almost in the barren state in our country.The first chapter from 1978 to 1988 of 10 years, which is 30 years the theory of Chinese journalism functions for recognition of a wide range of period, China was able to learn the news from the ruins of an important period of regeneration: Critique of the old rotten Fascist Journalism, reflection and transformation of traditional journalism, the political breakthrough in the restricted area for many years to establish the core of the concept of journalism, with an open vision of innovative research methods to seek the path of journalism in the reconstruction process, the implementation of its own time and leap , which, as the publicity over the years as the only fate of the Chinese press to provide a theoretical weapon for the liberation of their own, the release of long suppressed the development of energy, moving toward a modern journalism.Chapter II from 1989-1991, this time over the past three years, Chinese scholars are experiencing great idea for nearly 10 years after the liberation of the important period of reflection. Here, whether it is for journalism to reflect on the guiding principle of research, or academic writing, as well as the history of thinking about research methods, or for information on 10 years of theoretical research and news to reflect on the reform of the practice, are based on the premise, that is, how China’s national conditions to create a suitable system for study of the news. And consider the issue of reform and opening-up has become a 30-year history of Chinese journalism in the evolution of a turning point in connecting it to allow scholars to look at the start on 10 years of research, but also for the future set the tone of the study.Chapter III from 1992 - 2001 of 10 years, during which Chinese journalism major theoretical questions of property journalism major breakthrough in the study, namely, the establishment of a double property, thereby increasing depth of China’s reform and practical information theory provides a powerful sharp . At the same time, the theoretical system of Chinese Journalism Construction also "significant progress has been made," from "party" self-centered, "journalism" self-centered to the "news" leap-based. Here, the Chinese journalism study at the diversity of subject is also a major step forward.Chapter IV is from 2002 to 2008. For 6 years, the China News IS emerging public property .This is the practice of reform once again submitted to the academic world of the urgent need to solve a problem of great practical theory. Prior to this, the academic nature of China’s journalism has gone through a positioning of the ideology of a single property to the property covered by the enterprise "dual property" of the mutation. News of China to study based on innovation and development of the desire of advancing with the times, scholars in China to conduct a comprehensive review journalism, consciously follow the norms of journalism studies at the same time, also has first emerged the "method of worship" to reflect on. In addition, the the theoretical system of Chinese Journalism Construction also "significant progress has been made."Of course, study for the Chinese journalism, whether the concept of science, the sound system, a breakthrough in the theory or the scientific method, is also difficult to achieve the required mission. Want to see too many Chinese journalism also required to repair the contents of: the lack of dialogue with the world the ability of peers, lack of discipline on an equal footing with other recognition, all in all, in 30 years "still having a lot of journalism research questions and deficiencies", the News of China need to learn the future of innovation and development to innovation.更多还原