【作者】 张冬玲；

【导师】 刘则渊； 王续琨；

【作者基本信息】 大连理工大学 ， 管理科学与工程， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 自然科学的迅猛发展,使科学合作成为科学研究的主流;同时科学合作又极大促进了科学的发展。随之而来的科技成果的日新月异,特别是中国近年来科学论文产出数量呈指数增长等发展趋势为我们提出了科学计量的现实要求,目前关于中国科学产出、科学合作总体状况以及二者关联关系等问题还有待深入研究。本文基于科学论文产出的生产力理论、科学论文合作的生产关系理论和二者的关联理论以及科学学的基本研究范式,以科学论文和合著论文代表科学产出和科学合作,利用统计分析和数据挖掘、社会网络分析、知识图谱方法探讨了中国科学论文产出的生产力状况、科学论文合作的生产关系状况以及二者之间的关联关系。首先,基于Web of Science(包括SCI、SSCI、A&HCI)数据库中1975—2007年中国科学论文产出数据,以科学论文的产出作为计量科学生产力的切入点,论文从数量角度计量了中国科学产出的总体状况,从国家、城市、大学层面分析了中国科学产出的地域分布与学科分布特点,从地域集中、机构集中、学科集中三个角度阐述了中国科学产出的集中特征;然后以论文的被引频次和H指数为代表分析了中国科学论文的产出质量水平;进而从数量和质量双重角度展示了中国科学生产力:科学论文的产出状况。其次,运用社会网络分析方法,以科学论文的合作作为计量科学生产关系的切入点,论文一方面从国家、城市、大学的层面计量了中国科学论文的国际合作状况,发现中国科学论文国际合作总体处于增长趋势,通过对中国及中国主要城市与国外的论文合作状况进行的计量,发现论文合作累积数量的指数分布效应。另一方面从国内合作的角度对中国主要城市、主要大学的国内论文合作网络进行了深入分析,并运用社会网络中的中心性指数方法,研究和比较了中国主要城市、大学在合作网络中的合作状况。从国际和国内两个角度分析中国科学论文的合作网络,展示了中国的科学生产关系:科学论文合作状况。再次,将科学生产力与科学生产关系联系起来进行研究,依据第三、四章中的研究数据,分析了科学生产力与科学生产关系间的总体关联情况。以科学论文的产出数量和产出质量中的影响力(被引频次)代表科学生产力,以科学论文合作状况(论文合作作者数量、是否进行国际合作及不同的国际合作国家)代表科学生产关系,通过二者间的关联分析进一步论证了科学生产力与科学生产关系之间的关联关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 The rapid development of natural science has made science collaboration as the mainstream of science study, and scientific collaboration also promoted the development of science. The followed rapidly advancing of scientific achievement, especially the recently developing trend of output of scientific literature, has proposed the actual requirements for scientometrics. There is little study about the scientific output, scientific collaboration and their relationship in China. Based on the productive forces theory of scientific literature output, the productive relationship theory of scientific literature coauthorship and the basic paradigm of science of science, this paper make scientific literature output and coauthored literature as scientific output and scientific collaboration, using statistical analysis and data mining, social network analysis and knowledge mapping to study the productive force of China’s scientific literature output, the productive relationship of scientific coauthorship and their incidence relation.Firstly, based on the literature data of China from 1975 to 2007 indexed in Web of Science (including SCI, SSCI, A&HCI), this paper makes the scientific literature as the entry point to measure scientific productive force, and study the general situation of scientific output of China from the quantitive perspective, analyze the geographical distribution and subject distribution from three levels of country, cities and universities, and expound the concentricity of scientific output of China from three perspectives of regions, institutions and subjects. Further, the paper make the cited times and H index to measure the quality of scientific output of China, to study the scientific output of China from two perspectives of quantity and quality.Secondly, using social network analysis, the paper makes the scientific literature coauthorship as the entry point to measure scientific productive relationship. On one hand, the paper analyze the international collaboration of China’s scientific literature from three perspectives of country, cities and universities, which found the growth trend of international collaboration of China’s scientific literature; and based on metrics of international collaboration of Chinese main cities and universities, the paper reveals the Comulated distribution effect of collaboration. On the other hand, from the perspective of domestic collaboration of Chinese main cities and univerisities, the paper analyzes the coauthorship network. Using centrality in social network analyisi, the paper compares the coauthorship situation of main cities and institutions, analyzes the international and domestic coauthorship network of scientific literature of China, to demonstrate the scientific productive relationship represented by the coauthorship of scientific literature.Finally, the paper connects the scientific productive force and scientific productive relationship. According to the data in the 3 rd and 4 chapter, the paper analyzes the general relationship of scientific productive force and scientific productive. The author makes scientific literature output and the influence (cited times) as scientific productive force and the scientific literature collaboration (coauthors of one paper, coauthored papers or not, and different coauthor countries) as scientific productive relationship, to analyze the relationship between them.更多还原