【作者】 臧术美；

【导师】 冯绍雷；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 科学社会主义与国际共产主义运动， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 欧盟地区政策是欧盟政策体系中的一项重要政策。对该政策的研究，是深入理解和把握欧洲一体化的困境与未来的重要切入口。本文对欧盟地区政策的研究主要从两个大的方面展开：改革与效应。随着欧盟(欧共体)的不断扩大以及全球化过程中国际竞争的加剧，从20世纪70年代初步建立开始，欧盟地区政策先后经历了1988年、1999年、2004-2006年等多次重要改革，并逐步确立起完善成熟的政策体系。欧盟地区政策改革呈现出几个重要特点和趋势：“凝聚力”与“竞争力”双重目标强化趋势；程序的不断简化；欧盟、国家、地区等不同层级间“合作”不断加强，各自职权也进一步明晰，等等。欧盟地区政策的“效应”研究主要分为三个纬度：一是经济与社会效应，二是地域和空间效应，三是制度效应。从经济、社会和地域效应看，欧盟机构本身对欧盟地区政策的评估，以及经济学家借用新古典经济学、内生经济增长理论、新地理经济学等理论方法的评估，都没有得出足够乐观的结论。其中需要强调的是，欧盟地区政策效应评估过程中呈现出越来越明显的“地域化”和“空间化”趋势，这一趋势也同样反映在欧盟建设整个过程中。总体而言，人们普遍认为欧盟国家间的差距得到了一定程度的缩小，而国家内部地区间差距却在不断扩大。但我们并不能因此就完全否定欧盟地区政策的功效。因为如果没有这一政策，欧盟地区差距或许会更加严峻。此外，欧盟地区政策的“制度效应”主要表现在欧盟推动下的成员国“地区化”进程中。以波兰为例的中东欧国家“地区化”进程的“失败”，说明没有统一的“欧洲化”的“模板”，欧盟应该尽可能的尊重各国的“多样性”，实现“多样性中的统一”(Unie dans la diversit(?))。与此同时，欧洲“地区化”进程所遭遇的困难也让我们思考“地区”层级的相对地位问题，而“多层级治理”的模式关注不同等级之间资源的共享而非竞争，能够对此做出较为合理的诠释。最后，欧盟地区政策对中国地区发展有着一定的“启发性思考”和“可能性借鉴”：兼顾公平与效率，简化程序，加强各层级合作，通过“分权化”使职权明晰，加强监管，改变法律和制度“缺位”等等。更多还原

【Abstract】 Within European Union (EU) policy framework,the regional policy turns out tobe of essentiality,and the in-depth comprehension of which is quite important beforeyou can have an insight of where the unification of Europe might go,and along withwhat uneasiness.This dissertation unfolds the study of EU regional policy by lookingat two compelling spheres:reforms and impacts.At the wake of European enlargement and the increasing world competitionbrought up by globalization,EU regional policy,from taking shape back to 1970’s,has been through several mile-stone reforms in 1988,1999 and 2004-2006,before itstands quite competent and mature nowadays.Something coherent could be spotted:the due-target of“cohesion”and“competitiveness”has been consolidating,formalities haven been simplifying,EU herself and states,regions within it havegained more“engagement”among one another while the specific function of eachbetter defined.The study of impacts lies in three dimensions:one is economy and social impact,two,the territorial and spatial impact,three,the institutional impact.The economy,social and territorial impact reflects that,judging by the EU herself and taking intoconsideration of neoclassical economics theory,endogenous economic growth theoryand new geographical economics theory by economists,no conclusion optimisticenough can be arrived when the EU regional policy is under scrutiny.The“territorial”and“spatial”tendency has become more conspicuous not only in the assessment ofEU regional policy but also in the EU development process.Generally the disparityamong EU states has been decreased while the same is increased to regions withinevery state.However that doesn’t eclipse the success of those policies,which did helpto prevent the regional inequality from becoming worse.The“institution impact”canbe described by the“regionalization”of member states under the efforts of EU.The“failure”of east/middle European states like Poland when“regionalized”suggestedthat no such an“Europeanization”“model”exists,and EU shall pay more respect tothe“diversity”of each state.Meanwhile,the difficulty in European“regionalization”processes makes us thinking about the relative position of‘regional’level.It takes the“multi-level governance”to give a reasonable interpretation since it concerns theresource sharing between different levels and not the resource competition.At last but not the least,European regional policy could shed some“enlightenthinking”to regional development in China,when we talk about to trade off justiceand efficiency,to simplify formalities,to enhance cooperation at all levels,the“decentralization”and power clarification,to strengthen supervision and management,to correct the“omission”of law and regulation,etc.更多还原