【作者】 叶肖华；

【导师】 樊崇义；

【作者基本信息】 中国政法大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 刑事审判程序如何实行分流,这既是一个理论问题,也是一个实践性很强的问题。从程序分流这一崭新视角去研究刑事审判程序,具有理论研究的意义和价值。本文在考察域外刑事审判程序分流的理论和实践的基础上,进行比较研究,对我国刑事审判程序分流的运用和完善提出自己的观点。全文共分为七个部分:第一章,刑事审判程序分流的世界眼光和中国问题。本章在对刑事审判程序分流进行概念界定的基础上,从宏观上分析了刑事审判程序分流的世界性趋势和中国问题,强调了刑事审判程序分流有利于保障被告人的人权,有利于审判方式的改革完善,并从根本上有利于促进司法公正。刑事审判程序分流的基本路径,其实也就是我国现行的简易程序和普通程序简易审的改革路径,即吸收实务中普通程序简易审的合理成分进而对简易程序进行重构,扩大简易程序的适用范围,增设处罚令程序、刑事和解程序等促进案件简化审的程序。第二章,刑事审判程序分流的理论根基。本章指出了刑事审判程序分流的理论基础是和谐论、正义论、效率论和宽严相济原则,并且具体阐述了这些理论在刑事审判程序的分流中的运用和贯彻。第三章,刑事审判程序分流的决定程序:庭前审查程序。庭前审查程序又称为预审程序,是衔接公诉与审判的重要环节,它是一个决定刑事审判程序如何分流的程序,对于案件进入到法庭审判阶段后,采行何种程序进行审理具有至关重要的意义。在对域外庭前审查程序进行比较考察并对我国庭前审查程序进行回顾批评的基础上,提出了庭前审查程序的改革方案,庭前审查程序应定位于它是一个独立的预审程序,而不仅仅是一个为法庭审理做准备的程序,应当建立预审法官制度,实行预审法官和审判法官的分离。第四章,处罚令程序。处罚令程序是大陆法系国家处理简单、轻微刑事犯罪案件的一种简易程序,是一种庭审省略式审判即书面审理方式。在对域外处罚令程序进行比较考察的基础上,分析了我国设立处罚令制度的必要性和可行性,提出了我国设立处罚令制度的具体构想。第五章,简易程序和普通程序简易审改革研究。首先,对何谓简易程序进行厘定,区分狭义上的简易程序和广义上的简易程序;其次,比较考察简易程序和普通程序简易审的域外立法例;再次,对我国简易程序和普通程序简易审进行了回顾和批评;最后,提出重构我国的简易程序,将现行的简易程序和普通程序简易审整合为一种程序,即被告人认罪案件简易程序。第六章,刑事和解程序。“和解”就是以“和”的方法来“解”纠纷。在对刑事和解程序域外立法例和实务运作进行比较考察的基础上,分析了刑事和解制度在我国赖以生长的传统“和合”文化和现实利益基础,提出应在我国构建刑事和解制度。第七章,认罪协商程序。在对认罪协商程序的域外立法例和实务运作进行比较考察的基础上,分析了认罪协商制度本质上是一项与英美法系对抗式诉讼模式密切联系的制度,我国目前并不存在认罪协商制度的生长土壤,因而不宜盲目引进。更多还原

【Abstract】 To make divisions in criminal trial procedure is not only a theoretical problem but also a problem of strong practicability.It is of great theoretical research significance and value to study into the criminal trial procedure in this new perspective of procedure division.This dissertation, based on a review of the theories and practices of procedure division of criminal trial abroad,through a comparative study,comes out with the author’s own viewpoints on application and improvement of procedure division of criminal trial in China.The whole dissertation contains seven parts:ChapterⅠ,International outlook and Chinese problem on procedure division of criminal trial.Based on the concept definition of procedure division of criminal trial,this chapter analyzes its internationalization tendency and Chinese problem in a macrographic perspective.It is stressed that procedure division of criminal trial is favorable to the protection of accused person’s human rights,the reform and improvement of the mode of trial,and fundamentally to the promotion of judicial justice. The basic mode for procedure division of criminal trial,which is also the reform mode of our existent summary procedure and simplified trail of common procedure,is to absorb the appropriate elements of the simplified trail of common procedure and reconstruct it,thus to extend its scope of application.Meanwhile,to add procedures promoting trial simplification, like penal order procedure,criminal plea bargain procedure,etc.ChapterⅡ,Theoretical foundations of procedure division of criminal trial.It is pointed out in this chapter that the theoretical foundations of procedure division of criminal trial are theories of Harmony, Justice,Efficiency and Principle of Combining Punishment with Leniency. Furthermore,it expounds how to apply these theories in procedure division of criminal trial.ChapterⅢ,Determination procedure of procedure division of criminal trial:pre-trial review procedure.Pre-trial review procedure,also called preliminary procedure,is an important link connecting prosecution and trial.It is a procedure to decide the distribution of criminal trial procedure.It is of great importance to the case coming to the trial stage to choose what kind of procedure for trial.The author in this chapter makes a comparative study of the pre-trial review procedures abroad and a retrospection and comment of the pre-trial review procedure in China,and provides a reform proposal to it,namely,the pre-trial review procedure should be position-set as an independent preliminary procedure,rather than only a preparing step for courtroom trial,and there should be a preliminary trial judge system to ensure the separation of preliminary trial judge and trial judge.ChapterⅣ,Procedure of penal order.Procedure of penal order is a summary procedure dealing with simple slight criminal cases in civil law countries.It is a trial without court hearing,or a documentary trial.After a comparative study of the procedures of penal order abroad,the author analyzes the necessity and feasibility of establishing the penal order system in China,and gives a concrete construction of establishing penal order system in China.ChapterⅤ,A research on the reform of summary procedure and simplified trial of common procedure.First of all,this chapter determines the concept of summary procedure,and distinguishes between the summary procedure in a narrow sense and the one in a broad sense; secondly,it studies and compares the foreign legislations of summary procedure and simplified trial of common procedure;thirdly,it retrospects and comments on China’s summary procedure and simplified trial of common procedure;finally,it advices to reconstruct our summary procedure by integrating the existent summary procedure and simplified trial of common procedure into one procedure,viz.the summary procedure for defendant- confessed cases.ChapterⅥ,Procedure of criminal reconciliation.Reconciliation means to reconcile the dispute by considerate means.On the basis of a comparative study on foreign legislations of criminal reconciliation procedure and practical operations,the author has an analysis of the traditional "He-he" culture,on which the criminal reconciliation system in China relies,and the realistic interest base of the system,thus recommends to establish the criminal reconciliation system in China.ChapterⅦ,Procedure of plea bargain.Based on a comparative study of foreign legislations of plea bargain procedure and practical operations,the author analyzes that plea bargain system in essence is a system tied up to the adversarial proceeding mode of common law system, and it is better not to bring in this system since there is no such soil for it in China at the present time.更多还原