【作者】 柏亚东；

【导师】 詹鄞鑫；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 汉语言文字学， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 唐代墓誌出土數量龐大,誌文断代明確,敍述完整、獨立且爲衆多時人各自著述,雖然格式常有雷同,但文體成熟,文辭浩繁,語料非常豐富。因此,封墓讀詞語進行懬泛深入的考釋是讀懂墓讀並進行各種相關研究的根本前提,也是中古詞彙研究重要的组成部分之一。墓誌庚泛爲語言文字學界所關注的時代剛剛開始,文字、詞彙、音韻等方面的成果都有一些,雖然不多,但已經是较好的發端。唐代墓誌,作爲斷代出土文獻語料,作窮盡性的整理不太現實,但是,我们可以相對封閉地就一定數量的墓誌詞語進行全面考釋,如果有一個较大的覆蓋面,那麽,在這個封羳範圍中通釋的詞語對所有唐代墓誌而言就能具有廣泛的代表性,這項工作應該是大有益處的,但至今還没有人做過。本送题就是一個嘗試。本文分爲緒論、上編、下編三個部分。續論部分,主要是關於墓誌正名舆唐代墓誌研究現状的綜述。第一節封論了墓誌的涵義、起源舆名目以及墓誌的文體特徵,介绍了國外墓誌的相關情沉,對墓誌的特徵舆界定、墓誌的源起舆發展、墓誌稱名等問题作了評述,第二節對唐代墓誌的出土舆整理以及近二十多年來在史學考古、語言文字、文學等方面的研究成果作了說明和介绍。第三節闡明了課题的研究意義和研究目標。第四節是本課题的研究方法及釋文、句讀、標記等方面的有關說明。上編爲校記,筆者将依據1172方唐代墓誌拓片釋讀出來的誌文舆周紹良先生的《唐代墓誌彙編》對比后,發現二者存在一些差異,共列舉了80條校記。下編爲通釋,按照首字音序排列詞條,釋義以《漢語大詞典》爲参照,在詞條下先列義項,再考釋並引典籍書證,最後列墓誌材料。如果遇到墓誌詞義舆《漢語大詞典》有所不同或爲《充捂大詞典》所無的情沉,亦或不見于傅世文獻或工具書的墓誌詞,則考釋並佐以書證。本論文完成單音詞、複音詞(或詞组)的考釋600多條。其中,筆者考釋不見于《漢語大詞典》的墓誌詞語132個,不見于《漢語大詞典》的義项54條,提出義项商榷的有5個,可以提前《漢語大詞典》書證年代的53例。更多还原

【Abstract】 The excavated epigraphs of Tang Dynasty are known for the enormous quantity, clear-cut dynastic articles, and thorough and separated narrations of a large quantity of people in that dynasty. In spite of their similar formats, the epigraphs display the features of mature style, vast diction and abundant corpus. Therefore, a comprehensive explanation on the words is not only a prerequisite for the comprehension and various relevant researches but also a significant part of the middle-ancient-period vocabulary study.The age of wide concern/interest in the study of epigraphs from the circle of Chinese philology has just begun. Research achievements covering Chinese characters, vocabulary and rhyme and rhythm, though not very fruitful, present themselves a promising start. It is unfeasible to conduct a completely thorough research on the dynastic excavated corpus of epigraphs of Tang Dynasty. However, it is workable to give a rather comprehensive explanation on the words of the epigraphs in a relatively closed manner, because, if covered in a wide scope, the words explained may be representative, relative to all epigraphs of the dynasty in question. Such a research has not been dealt with, though of great value. That is why the present study comes into being.The whole dissertation is put into 3 parts with a brief introduction as follows:Chapter I of Part I gives an introduction, mainly concerning name differentiation and literature review of present studies. Section I discusses the definitions, origin, names, the characteristics of their style with review of all the above issues. This section also touches studies of epigraphs abroad. Section II introduces the excavation of the epigraphs and the research achievements in terms of history archaeology, language philology and literature. Section III concerns the significance and research aims of the present project. Section IV concerns methodology, identification, punctuation, and marks.Part II makes a contrast between the articles of 1172 rubbings and those of Zhou Shaoliang’s Compilation of Epigraphs of Tang Dynasty, and finds that, apart from differences. In total, the paper lists 80 rectified items.Part III, in alphabetical order, explains all words, with reference to Chinese Dictionary. Under each item of words, items of meanings come first, then follow the examined explanation with quotations from classics and written examples, and finally come epigraphs where the words are used. Explanations and their written examples are provided in the cases that the meaning deciphered differ from that, or is missing in Chinese dictionary, or even, they cannot be found in literature and reference books. This study, without deliberate repetition in the words explained with preceding researches, finishes approximately 600 entries of single-syllable and poly-syllable words and expressions, in which 132 entries of epigraphic words and 54 items of meanings are not covered in Chinese Dictionary. Five items of meaning are put to further discussion and the years of written examples of 53 words can be move forward.更多还原