【作者】 刘李；

【导师】 贺来；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2008， 博士

【副题名】对当代哲学中关于观念本性的一种新的解释范式的探讨

【摘要】 本文从“症候”概念和“解释”概念入手,来展开对观念本性的一种当代解释范式的探讨。本文以“深层解释学”来表述这一解释范式,并将历史唯物主义、尼采哲学、古典精神分析视为“深层解释学”的典范性样例。这一解释范式的新颖和深刻之处在于,它将观念、思想、意识视为症候,对于它们的解释既是一种深层解释,又是一种对其伪装和歪曲形式的分析。对观念、思想、意识的深层解释学分析显示:它们没有自在的本质,没有独立的历史,不是自在的、自足的力量,即它们没有自主性。从而,深层解释学以不同于“观念主义”的方式重新理解了观念、思想、意识的本性。更多还原

【Abstract】 From the view of hermeneutic, there is a family resemblance among Nietzsche, Freud, and Marx. Foucault thought that these three thinkers even could make a new hermeneutic. At the same time, all the three thinkers considered the thought, idea, and consciousness as hermeneutic object rather than hermeneutic basis, and they establish a basis to a new exegesis method for idea. Thus, in a certain context of hermeneutic, it could be explained to thought, idea, and consciousness followed their ideas. We gather up this new exegesis method for idea by deep hermeneutic, and use historical materialism, Nietzsche’s philosophy and classical psychoanalysis as its paradigm. Deep hermeneutic represents a new thinking method, and it is a special conception device. Its key words are constructed of Symptom, hermeneutic, power and confrontation, and the key words set relationship among each other.Based on the view of Deep Hermeneutic, thought, idea, and consciousness are considered as symptom, which the performance is disguise and distortion. The explain to thought, idea, and consciousness is symptom analysis, which on the one hand, constantly mining the power composed and dominated symptom, on the other hand, explain the problem of“how symptom can perform as the model of symptom?”. And those are the two aspects of one explain process.The question itself and the way of putting out questions to thoughts, idea, consciousness constructed by Deep Hermeneutic are with the characters of hermeneutic. To emphasize, they are not with the characters of epistemology. The main questions of them are based on“significance”rather than“truth”. Deep Hermeneutic dismantled the conception device of abstract epistemology, which make the“truth issue”possible. And when Deep Hermeneutic explained thought, idea, and consciousness in a new way, it dismantled and understood a serious of dualistic opposition related with thoughts, for example, thoughts and reality, theory and practice, rational and non-rational, explanation and criticism. The produce of those oppositions is related to the way of metaphysics and abstract epistemology to understand thought, idea, and consciousness.When Deep Hermeneutic considers thought, idea, and consciousness as symptom, it confirms their non-autonomy. As the symptom of thought, idea, and consciousness, is the performance of the tings be performed. It does not have its own nature; its significance is not only its own; it does not have the power or history of its own; therefore, it can only be researched for the Genealogy of thought, idea, and consciousness.更多还原