节点文献

台港新儒学阐释下的“中国艺术精神”

The Artistic Spirit of China under the Annotation of the Neo-Confucianism of Taiwan and Hongkong

【作者】 孙琪

【导师】 刘绍瑾;

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 , 文艺学, 2006, 博士

【摘要】 明确标举“中国艺术精神”并展开深入探讨,徐复观是第一人。除徐复观以外,现代新儒学之第二代台港新儒家其他成员如方东美、唐君毅等都或多或少涉及过这个问题,皆因这一话题背后隐藏着古与今、中与西的深层美学对话。现代新儒学思想博大精深,研究领域涉及历史、哲学、艺术、道德、宗教等。本论文在观照其哲学基础和文化背景的前提下,以第二代台港新儒学诗学和美学为基础,利用比较的方法,对话理论,阐释学和历史文化的方法等理论工具,对以上台港新儒家的共同话题作深入考察和系统梳理,把握徐复观等人阐释“中国艺术精神”的世界视野和方法,以及他们探讨这一问题时所折射出的深层文化内蕴,同时注意与研究对象相关的上下左右的联系。由于台港新儒家的美学研究兼有会通儒道艺术精神、融合中西美学思想,及发掘传统美学之当代价值等的层面,这些无一不是中国当代美学的重大课题,因此带着问题意识用跨文化、跨学科的视野重新审视他们探讨过的问题并追踪问题的延伸,将对中国当代美学的建构和比较诗学的研究都有着重要的启发意义。

【Abstract】 Xu Fuguan is the first man who emphasized the artistic spirit of China and had an in-depth study. Besides Xu Fuguan, representatives of the second generation of the Modern Neo-Confucianism in Taiwan and Hongkong like Fang Dongmei and Tang Junyi had also touched upon the topic. All the scholars mentioned here had done their studies because of the deep-seated dialogue between ancient and modern China and that between China and the west. The thought of the Modern Neo-Confucianism is broad and deep. Its domain of study involves history, philosophy, art, moral and religion, and so on. On the condition of philosophy and the background of culture of the Modern Neo-Confucianism and based on the poetics and aesthetics of the Neo-Confucianism of Taiwan and Hongkong, my dissertation makes an in-depth study and systemic summarization of the common topic of the Neo-Confucianism of Taiwan and Hongkong by means of comparison, the theory of dialogue, hermeneutics and the historical and cultural approaches, and demonstrates a mastery of the international view and approach of Xu Fuguan and others’ study of the artistic spirit of China and the cultural implication reflected therein. At the same time, the dissertation does not neglect all-around aspects associated with the object. The Neo-Confucianism of Taiwan and Hongkong’s aesthetic study combines the artistic spirit of Confucianism and Taoism, introjects the aesthetics of China and the west, and excavates the modern merits of traditional aesthetic, which are important problems of the modern Chinese aesthetics. Therefore, it is very helpful to the modern Chinese aesthetic and the comparative poetics that we scan the Neo-Confucianism of Taiwan and Hongkong’s problems again and pursue the evolution of these problems in a cross-cultural and cross-subject view.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 暨南大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2007年 06期
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络